Gift Card Meanings

Author(s):  
Caroline Graham Austin ◽  
Lei Huang ◽  
Daniel L. Huffman
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane S. Chen ◽  
◽  
Brian L. Sprague ◽  
Carrie N. Klabunde ◽  
Anna N. A. Tosteson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy J Morgan ◽  
Ronald M Rapee ◽  
Jordana K Bayer

Background/aims Achieving a high response rate to follow-up questionnaires in randomized controlled trials of interventions is important for study validity. Few studies have tested the value of incentives in increasing response rates to online questionnaires in clinical trials of health interventions. This study evaluated the effect of a gift card prize-draw incentive on response rates to follow-up questionnaires within a trial of an online health intervention. Method The study was embedded in a host randomized controlled trial of an online parenting program for child anxiety. A total of 433 participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups: (1) being informed that they would enter a gift card prize-draw if they completed the final study questionnaire (24-week follow-up) and (2) not informed about the prize-draw. All participants had a 1 in 20 chance of winning an AUD50 gift card after they completed the online questionnaire. Results The odds of the informed group completing the follow-up questionnaire were significantly higher than the uninformed group, (79.6% vs 68.5%, odds ratio = 1.79, 95% confidence interval = 1.15–2.79). This response rate increase of 11.1% (95% confidence interval = 2.8–19.1) occurred in both intervention and control groups in the host randomized controlled trial. The incentive was also effective in increasing questionnaire commencement (84.6% vs 75.9%, odds ratio = 1.74, 95% confidence interval = 1.07–2.84) and reducing the delay in completing the questionnaire (19.9 vs 22.6 days, hazard ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.07–1.67). Conclusion This study adds to evidence for the effectiveness of incentives to increase response rates to follow-up questionnaires in health intervention trials.


Omega ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 102588
Author(s):  
Pingping Chen ◽  
Huiru Chen ◽  
Ruiqing Zhao
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Stephanie T. Gillison ◽  
Sharon E. Beatty ◽  
Kristy E. Reynolds
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (9/10) ◽  
pp. 1827-1844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene Chan ◽  
Najam Saqib

Purpose The endowment effect is well-established in economics, psychology and marketing where sellers place a higher value on a good than buyers. One potential moderator, namely, power is explored. The authors predicted that feeling powerful can reverse the effect, making buyers place a higher value on a good than sellers. Design/methodology/approach The authors manipulated power to assess the effects on the valuation of three different products (keychain, gift card and iPhone case). They also assessed participants’ focus on parting with the good (money), which is a loss, and receiving money (the good), which is a gain, for sellers (buyers). Findings Feelings of power reduced sellers’ prices but they increased buyers’. Crucially, the authors observed the endowment effect, but only under conditions of low power. When participants had high power, the effect reversed, with buyers placing a higher value on the good under transaction than sellers. Process data indicated that powerful buyers and sellers focused on what they gained and less on what they lost, compared to powerless buyers and sellers. Research limitations/implications The authors link the construct of power with the endowment effect, showing that the former can moderate the latter. Certainly, the endowment effect is well-established, but there are moderators and boundary conditions that warrant consideration. Practical implications The results suggest a case where the market may clear, where buyers value a consumer product more than sellers, and thus buyers would likely accept the offer made by sellers. Originality/value The authors are the first to link the power literature with the endowment effect. They also show a possible moderator for the well-established endowment effect.


2011 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moutaz Khouja ◽  
Jingming Pan ◽  
Brian T. Ratchford ◽  
Jing Zhou

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-333
Author(s):  
Mario J. Miranda ◽  
Laszló Kónya
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document