WATCHMAN Device

Author(s):  
Karen P. Phillips ◽  
Saibal Kar
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 2063
Author(s):  
Vittorio R. Terrigno ◽  
Jian Liang Tan ◽  
Michael Foster ◽  
Sajjad Sabir

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 955
Author(s):  
Lauren Sharan Ranard ◽  
Elena Donald ◽  
Shmuel Chen ◽  
Omar Khalique ◽  
Nadira Hamid ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 412
Author(s):  
Jay Shah ◽  
Kritika Luthra ◽  
Sindhu Avula ◽  
Devina Adalja ◽  
Ma’En Al-Dabbas ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. S35
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Morales ◽  
Bernardo Galvan ◽  
Ozman Ochoa ◽  
Katherine Holder ◽  
Ronnie Orozco ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhilash Akinapelli ◽  
Ojas Bansal ◽  
Jack P. Chen ◽  
Alex Pflugfelder ◽  
Nicole Gordon ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (24) ◽  
pp. 2785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susie N. Hong ◽  
Ali Rahimi ◽  
Kraig V. Kissinger ◽  
Ivan Pedrosa ◽  
Warren J. Manning ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (18) ◽  
pp. C29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ömer Sanatci ◽  
Anja Schade ◽  
Guido Groschup ◽  
K. Wehner ◽  
Burghard Schumacher ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 394-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyoten Takayuki ◽  
Oliver Grimmig ◽  
Just Sören ◽  
Fritzsche Dirk

Device dislocation associated with left atrial appendage closure with a Watchman device is rare. Few cases of surgical treatment have been reported. Therefore, surgical options and the effects of the surgery on subsequent operations are unknown. This device was implanted in 2 patients in another hospital because of frequent brain and intestinal bleeding related to coagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation. However, routine echocardiography revealed dislocation from the left atrial appendage orifice in the early and late postoperative periods. Emergency surgical removal of the devices was performed. Perioperative device management and treatment strategies are discussed briefly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document