The Utility of 3D Printing of Cardiac Models Like Left Atrial Appendage for Closure With Watchman Device and the Comparison Between CT and TEE-Guided 3D Printing

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. S35
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Morales ◽  
Bernardo Galvan ◽  
Ozman Ochoa ◽  
Katherine Holder ◽  
Ronnie Orozco ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 955
Author(s):  
Lauren Sharan Ranard ◽  
Elena Donald ◽  
Shmuel Chen ◽  
Omar Khalique ◽  
Nadira Hamid ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhilash Akinapelli ◽  
Ojas Bansal ◽  
Jack P. Chen ◽  
Alex Pflugfelder ◽  
Nicole Gordon ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (18) ◽  
pp. C29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ömer Sanatci ◽  
Anja Schade ◽  
Guido Groschup ◽  
K. Wehner ◽  
Burghard Schumacher ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 394-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyoten Takayuki ◽  
Oliver Grimmig ◽  
Just Sören ◽  
Fritzsche Dirk

Device dislocation associated with left atrial appendage closure with a Watchman device is rare. Few cases of surgical treatment have been reported. Therefore, surgical options and the effects of the surgery on subsequent operations are unknown. This device was implanted in 2 patients in another hospital because of frequent brain and intestinal bleeding related to coagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation. However, routine echocardiography revealed dislocation from the left atrial appendage orifice in the early and late postoperative periods. Emergency surgical removal of the devices was performed. Perioperative device management and treatment strategies are discussed briefly.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Gopinathannair ◽  
Scott M Koerber ◽  
Krishna Akella ◽  
Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy

Background: The Amulet IDE trial is an ongoing, randomized, worldwide trial, enrolled but following patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk of stroke. The study is comparing the safety and effectiveness of the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ left atrial appendage (LAA) Occluder to the Watchman device. At US sites, the implanting physicians only had experience with the Watchman device; therefore, up to three roll-in subjects with Amplatzer Amulet device implantation were permitted prior to randomization. The purpose of this analysis is to describe the peri-procedural outcomes for the roll-in cohort. Methods: Roll-in subjects met the same eligibility criteria and have the same data collection requirements as randomized subjects. Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee and LAA occlusion was assessed by an independent core laboratory based on the 45-day TEE. Major adverse events included all cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism or device-/procedure-related events requiring open cardiac surgery or major endovascular intervention within 7 days post implant or hospital discharge, whichever is later. Results: From August 2016 to November 2018, 201 patients with non-valvular AF at high risk of stroke and bleeding were enrolled at 82 sites as roll-in subjects. Mean age was 74.2 ± 7.5 years and 62% of subjects were male. The Amplatzer Amulet device was successfully deployed in 99% of subjects. Major adverse events within 7 days or hospital discharge occurred in 2.5% of patients and included death (n=3), ischemic stroke (n=1) and vascular access site bleeding (n=1). The majority (79%) of patients were discharged on antiplatelet therapy only or no anti-thrombotic medication. TEE follow-up at the 45-day visit revealed adequate (≤ 5 mm jet) occlusion of the appendage in 98.9% (178/180) of patients. Device-related thrombus (DRT) was identified by the core laboratory in 6 patients (3%); no patient experienced a thrombo-embolic event. Conclusions: In the roll-in cohort, with implanting physicians having no prior experience using the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device, there was a low rate of procedural complications and high rates of both implant success and adequate LAA sealing at follow up.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ajmal ◽  
Vijendra Swarup

Atrial fibrillation is characterized by irregularly irregular heart rhythm with an increased morbidity and mortality. It is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism due to formation of blood clot in the left atrium. Most of these blood clots are formed in the left atrial appendage. The risk of blood clot formation is reduced with the use of anticoagulants. The patients who cannot take anticoagulants due to an increased bleeding risk can undergo percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure. A Watchman device is used for this purpose. LAA closure with the Watchman device is associated with some adverse effects, and one of them is device-related thrombus. Currently, there are no specific guidelines for the management of device-related thrombus. We present a case of Watchman device-related thrombus which developed 16 hours after the device placement. We will also discuss various options for the management of acute thrombosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document