Author(s):  
Abraham P. Buunk ◽  
Karlijn Massar ◽  
Pieternel Dijkstra ◽  
Ana María Fernández

This chapter discusses sex differences in intersexual competition and describes particularly the consequences of such competition for conflict between the sexes, as well as for sex differences in mate guarding and, relatedly, in the types of infidelity that evoke jealousy, including online infidelity. It also discusses individual differences in jealousy as related to attachment styles and describes the effects of height, hormones, and the menstrual cycle on jealousy. Next, the chapter moves on to intrasexual competition and discusses, among other topics, intrasexual competition among men and among women, the role of sex differences in rival characteristics in evoking jealousy, the role of attachment styles and hormones, and individual differences in intrasexual competitiveness.


Author(s):  
Rachel Corney ◽  
Anne Haley ◽  
Laura Weir

Nuptial colouration in animals may serve as a signal of competitor and/or mate quality during breeding. In many temperate fishes, nuptial colouration develops during discrete breeding seasons and is a target of sexual selection. We examine nuptial colouration and behaviour of a unique ecotype of Threespine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus Linnaeus, 1758), wherein males turn from dull brown-grey to pearlescent white during the breeding season. The main goal of this work was to determine the relative role of white colouration in intersexual competition and mate choice. In a combination of a field and laboratory work, we found that males are brightest white when engaging in courtship activities in the presence of a female; this indicates that white colouration may be primarily related to enhancing signalling during mate attraction. White colouration intensity increased as the breeding season progressed and may be related to an influx of conspecifics. Colour change from cryptic grey to bright white occurred rapidly (< 90 seconds) and may be deployed to enhance behavioural signals. We conclude that bright white colouration in the white ecotype is a potential signal of mate quality and may have evolved from a previously existing capacity for colour plasticity in common Threespine Stickleback.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuping Wu ◽  
Yun Tang ◽  
Tingfa Dong ◽  
Yongmei Liao ◽  
Dadong Li ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Langston ◽  
Sievert Rohwer ◽  
Dave Gori

2013 ◽  
Vol 449 ◽  
pp. 186-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrícia L. Mancini ◽  
Alexander L. Bond ◽  
Keith A. Hobson ◽  
Leandro S. Duarte ◽  
Leandro Bugoni

2008 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. 1235-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Bulté ◽  
M.-A. Gravel ◽  
G. Blouin-Demers

Sexual dimorphism in body size and in trophic morphology are common in animals and are often concordant with patterns of habitat use and diet. Proximate factors leading to intersexual differences in habitat use, however, are challenging to unravel because these differences may stem from sexual dimorphism or may be caused by intersexual competition. Intersexual differences in diet and habitat use are common in size dimorphic reptiles. In this study, we investigated factors contributing to intersexual differences in diet and habitat use in a population of northern map turtles ( Graptemys geographica (Le Sueur, 1817)) from Ontario, Canada. Using radiotelemetry, we showed that in a lake map turtles do not exhibit intersexual differences in habitat use, in contrast to river populations. Patterns of habitat use were also inconsistent with prey distribution. The lack of intersexual habitat use differences in our lake population, despite marked differences in prey distribution, also indicated that intersexual habitat use differences documented in river populations are a consequence of sexual dimorphism in swimming capacity. Using stable isotope analysis and fecal analysis, we found a large dietary overlap between males and females, indicating no intersexual competition for food. Patterns of prey selection in females, however, were concordant with the reproductive role hypothesis.


Author(s):  
Valerie G. Starratt ◽  
Todd K. Shackelford

Oikos ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik G. Smith ◽  
Maria I. Sandell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document