Western sandpipers ( Calidris mauri (Cabanis, 1857)) exhibit slight female-biased sexual size dimorphism (5%) but disproportionate bill length dimorphism (15.9%). We test two predictions of the niche differentiation hypothesis at two wintering sites in Mexico with uniform western sandpiper densities, and use sex ratio as an index of intersexual competition. First, to test whether bill length dimorphism is larger at sites where sex ratios are strongly male-biased, we develop a migrant-based null model to represent dimorphism (12%, based on the average of males and females) in the absence of competition. Relative to the null model, bill length dimorphism was significantly larger at the large site (Santa María: 13.4%) but not at the small site (Punta Banda: 12.7%). Second, we tested whether bill length dimorphism increases as sex ratio approaches 1:1. Although the sex-ratio difference between sites was only 5%, bill length dimorphism increased marginally in the predicted direction. Additional comparisons suggest a cline in bill length dimorphism that mirrors a latitudinal gradient in prey burial depth. While sexual size dimorphism in the western sandpiper likely derived from selection for different body size optima, intersexual competition for food on the wintering grounds appears to have promoted further divergence in bill length.