Preindication Mining for Predicting Pedestrian Action Change

2016 ◽  
pp. 359-370
Author(s):  
Kenji Nishida ◽  
Takumi Kobayashi ◽  
Taro Iwamoto ◽  
Shinya Yamasaki
Keyword(s):  
Action Change

Optimized control over modes of hydraulic percussion cutting heads of mining machines

2020 ◽  
pp. 95-104
Author(s):  
Yu. M. Smirnov ◽  
B. M. Kenzhin ◽  
N. S. Smakova ◽  
M. A. Zhurunova
Keyword(s):  
Time Derivative ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Control Action ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Output Data ◽  
Working Cycle ◽  
Control Units ◽  
Action Change ◽  
Function Element ◽  
Service Factors

The main cause of the disagreement between the actual and calculated output data of hydraulic percussion mining machines is the erroneous feed of manipulation signals by the control units. For the maximal fitting of the calculated and actual figures, the continuous method of control action using the third time derivative of the law of motion of the main function element is accepted, namely, the accuracy. The mathematical models of control using displacement, velocity and acceleration are developed. The service factors of mining machines are found. Based on the theory of control and the mathematical logic theory, the logical circuits of formation of manipulation signals in each phase of the working cycle are developed. The main elements are converters, integrators and accumulators ensuring decomposition of elements of the logical circuits and further generation of appropriate control action. It is found that the simplest way is to generate the control action for acceleration of the key function element. For the developed circuits, it is recommended to use general charts of the control action change, implementable for a certain design of hydraulic percussion cutting heads in certain operating conditions.

scholarly journals Journal Entry, July 2020: Affirmation, Inclusion, Equity and Everyone

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-135
Author(s):  
Lauren Thomas Quigley ◽  
Monica Cox ◽  
Cynthia J. Atman ◽  
Jennifer Turns
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Black Students ◽  
Engineering Education ◽  
The United States ◽  
Internal Reflection ◽  
Professional Organization ◽  
Journal Entry ◽  
Personal Stories ◽  
Action Change ◽  
The Moment

When we reflect on 2020, especially in the United States, the divides in society amplified by the pandemic and laid bare for all to see following the murder of George Floyd in Minnesota in May, 2020 will most likely be the top of mind. We could all see this nation’s history and current complicity for racism, both the systematic and systemic. The moment was not unfamiliar, but markedly different. Initially, we wrote this piece in the summer of 2020, in response to our professional organization’s delay and hesitancy to affirm Black lives, Black students, Black engineers and Black faculty. Many of us were crying out. Allies with commitment to action showed up for and with us -- no questions asked, to ensure that what we felt was at least heard. In nearly a year since our original effort to write this piece together, some things have changed for the better. We saw our professional organization affirm Black lives. We saw some of our colleagues take action, change course and use their influence to make the community better. Some learned, listened and tried to do something new. Others, either remained silent, hopefully in contemplation, but some with a silence that convinces us that they are simply not on the same side. We composed the below entries in the summer of 2020, amid national turbulence and internal reflection. Below we provide four personal stories and some specific calls to action situated in the summer of 2020, but these remain our aspirations and hopes for the field of engineering education.

scholarly journals Midfrontal neural dynamics distinguish between general control and inhibition-specific processes in the stopping of motor actions

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Kaiser ◽  
Natalie Annette Simon ◽  
Paul Sauseng ◽  
Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Keyword(s):  
Error Rates ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Oscillatory Activity ◽  
General Control ◽  
Selective Marker ◽  
Human Volunteers ◽  
Action Change ◽  
Motor Actions ◽  
Action Inhibition ◽  
Theta Range

Abstract Action inhibition, the suppression of action impulses, is crucial for goal-directed behaviour. In order to dissociate neural mechanisms specific to motor stopping from general control processes which are also relevant for other types of conflict adjustments, we compared midfrontal oscillatory activity in human volunteers via EEG between action inhibition and two other types of motor conflicts, unexpected action activation and unexpected action change. Error rates indicated that action activation was significantly easier than the other two equally demanding tasks. Midfrontal brain oscillations were significantly stronger for inhibition than for both other conflict types. This was driven by increases in the delta range (2–3 Hz), which were higher for inhibition than activation and action change. Increases in the theta range (4–7 Hz) were equally high for inhibition and change, but lower for action activation. These findings suggest that inhibition is facilitated by neural mechanisms specific to motor-stopping, with midfrontal delta being a potentially selective marker of motor inhibition.

The fluid events model: Predicting continuous task action change

2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (10) ◽  
pp. 2051-2072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel A. Radvansky ◽  
Sidney D'Mello ◽  
Robert G. Abbott ◽  
Brent Morgan ◽  
Karl Fike ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Action Change

Presentation of hardness and action change by using pseudo force sense by asymmetric vibration

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (0) ◽  
pp. 2A2-N09
Author(s):  
Mamoru Ogaki ◽  
Yuto Okuda ◽  
syunsuke Komizunai ◽  
Atsushi Konno
Keyword(s):  
Action Change ◽  
Force Sense ◽  
Asymmetric Vibration

scholarly journals From Research to Action: Four Theories and Their Implications for Knowledge Mobilization

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Mosher ◽  
Uzo Anucha ◽  
Henry Appiah ◽  
Sue Levesque
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Social Problem ◽  
Knowledge Mobilization ◽  
Learning Spaces ◽  
Action Research Project ◽  
Building Capacity ◽  
Multiple Levels ◽  
Action Change ◽  
The Relationship

Integral to both knowledge mobilization and action research is the idea that research can and should ignite change or action. Change or action may occur at multiple levels and scales, in direct and predictable ways and in indirect and highly unpredictable ways. To better understand the relationship between research and action or change, we delineate four conceptualizations that appear in the literature. Reflecting on our experiences as collaborators in a community–university action research project that set out to tackle a “wicked” social problem, we consider the implications of these conceptualizations for the project’s knowledge mobilization plans and activities. The major lessons point to the importance of building capacity by nurturing collaborative learning spaces, of drawing many others – situated differently and with varied perspectives – into dialogue, and of embracing change within the project itself.

scholarly journals The effect of change moratorium phase on the reaction time in action change

2014 ◽  
Vol 78 (0) ◽  
pp. 1PM-1-078-1PM-1-078
Author(s):  
Maya Katsuhara-Hori ◽  
Ryuta Iseki ◽  
Sayako Ueda ◽  
Eishi Tsutamori ◽  
Takatsune Kumada
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Action Change
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document