Corporate Governance Codes Under the Spotlight

2017 ◽  
pp. 3-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean J. du Plessis ◽  
Chee Keong Low
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Governance Codes

scholarly journals Does Governance Affect Compliance with IFRS 7?

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 239
Author(s):  
Amal Yamani ◽  
Khaled Hussainey ◽  
Khaldoon Albitar
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Mandatory Disclosure ◽  
Disclosure Requirements ◽  
Corporate Governance Codes ◽  
Ifrs 7 ◽  
Enforcement Mechanisms ◽  
The Impact

Although there has been considerable research on the impact of corporate governance on corporate voluntary disclosure, empirical evidence on how governance affects compliance with mandatory disclosure requirements is limited. We contribute to governance and disclosure literature by examining the impact of corporate governance on compliance with IFRS 7 for the banking sector in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). We use a self-constructed disclosure index to measure compliance with IFRS 7. We use regression analyses to examine the impact of board characteristics, audit committee characteristics and ownership structure on compliance with IFRS 7. Using a sample of 335 bank-year observations for GCC listed banks over the period 2011–2017, we report evidence that corporate governance variables affect compliance with IFRS 7. However, the significance of these variables depends on the type of the regression model used. Our findings suggest that governance matters for mandatory disclosure requirements. So to improve the level of compliance, regulators, official authorities, and policymakers should intensify their efforts toward improving corporate governance codes, following up their implementation and enhancing the enforcement mechanisms.

scholarly journals Corporate Governance Codes and Intellectual Capital: Evaluating the Performance Impacts among Government-Linked Companies in Malaysia and Singapore – A Panel Data Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 08004
Author(s):  
Yen Wen Chang ◽  
Ng Ching Yat David ◽  
Suet Cheng Low ◽  
Peck Ling Tee
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Panel Data ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Corporate Governance Codes ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact

The objective of this study was to examine and compare the effects of corporate governance (CG) and intellectual capital (IC) between Malaysia Government-Linked Companies’ (M-GLCs) and Singapore Government-Linked Companies’ (S-GLCs) firm performance (FP). Panel data analysis was employed to analyse the impact of CG’s variables and IC’s variables on FP. FP was measured by Return on Total Assets (ROA), Tobin’s Q and Earnings Per Share (EPS). Data was gathered from the website of Bursa Malaysia and the Stock Exchange of Singapore from 2005 to 2018. The sample size of this research was 60 GLCs which comprised of 34 M-GLCs and 26 S-GLCs. There were a total 840 firm year observations. Results indicated that CGs of S-GLCs have greater impact on FP when compared to M-GLCs while the findings of the IC of M-GLCs have greater impact on FP compared to S-GLCs. This research was helpful in offering further insights of CG practices and IC efficiency to the Government, Board of Directors, policy makers, shareholders and stakeholders.

scholarly journals A comparative analysis of the board evaluation in European entities: Italy vs UK

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 578-587
Author(s):  
Donatella Busso ◽  
Alain Devalle ◽  
Fabio Rizzato
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Size Composition ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Corporate Governance Codes ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
The Uk

Board evaluation is an evaluation of the performance of the board of directors and its committees, as well as their size, composition and operation. The aim of this paper is to investigate how entities do the evaluation of the performance of the board and how they disclose the self-assessment. We analysed the largest forty constituents of both Italy’s FTSE MIB index and the UK’s FTSE 100 index. The results show that although Corporate Governance Codes’ requirements are similar, implementation of these requirements and the related disclosure continue to show significant differences. The UK companies seem to have a stronger “forward-looking” approach compared to Italian companies. Disclosure provided by Italian companies is too often not enough to enable stakeholder understanding of the process and its outcome. This research contributes to the literature by providing results on the evaluation of boards of directors: regulators, practitioners and researchers must deal with this topic in order to strengthen the rules of corporate governance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document