Main Disadvantages of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy

2018 ◽  
pp. 325-336
Author(s):  
Michele Schiano di Visconte ◽  
Arianna Pasquali ◽  
Tommaso Cipolat Mis
Author(s):  
Alessandro Sturiale ◽  
Bernardina Fabiani ◽  
Claudia Menconi ◽  
Danilo Cafaro ◽  
Felipe Celedon Porzio ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hemorrhoidal disease is the most common proctologic condition in adults. Among the different surgical procedures, one of the greatest innovations is represented by the stapled hemorrhoidopexy. The history of this technique started with a single stapler use passing thorough a double stapler technique to resect the adequate amount of prolapse, finally arriving to the use of high volume devices. Methods: Nevertheless each device has its own specific feature, the stapler is basically made up with one or more circular lines of titanium staples whose height may be variable. The procedure is based on different steps: Introduction of the CAD, evaluation of the prolapse, fashioning purse string or parachute suture, introduction of the stapler head beyond the suture, pull the wires through the window, close the stapler and keep pulled the wires of the suture held together with a forcep, fire using two hands, open the stapler and remove it and check the staple line and then check the specimen. One of the latest innovations in stapled surgery the Tissue Selective Therapy. It is a minimally invasive procedure in which there is a partial circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy focused on the prolapsing piles with bridges of normal mucosa left. Results: Several studies have reported that SH is a safe and effective procedure to treat the hemorrhoidal prolapse. It is a quicker procedure with a shorter hospital stay and earlier return to work if compared with the conventional treatment. This is due to a less postoperative pain, postoperative bleeding, wound complications and constipation. Furthermore, the first generation devices had worse outcomes if compared with those of the new generation stapler that showed lower postoperative complication rate with better anatomical and symptomatic results. Conclusions: Stapled procedure for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoidal prolapse represents one of the most important innovations in proctology of the last century bringing with it the new revolutionary concept of the rectal intussusception as a determining factor involved in the natural history of the disease. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy marked an era in which the surgeon may to offer to the patients a safe, effective treatment with less pain and fast recovery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Giarratano ◽  
Edoardo Toscana ◽  
Claudio Toscana ◽  
Giuseppe Petrella ◽  
Mostafa Shalaby ◽  
...  

Aim. This study aims to compare the early and late outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Methods. From January 2013 to December 2014, 100 patients—50 patients on each arm—were randomly allocated to THD or SH groups. The inclusion criteria were grade III and IV hemorrhoids diagnosed by clinical examination and proctoscopy. The primary outcome was to compare the recurrence rate with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, and the secondary outcome was to compare complications rate, time to return to work postsurgery, procedure length, and patient’s satisfaction between the 2 techniques. Results. The mean follow-up period was 33.7 ± 7.6. The recurrence rate was 4% in the SH group and 16% in the THD group ( P = .04). There was no difference in the intraoperative and postoperative complications rate; the pain score was significantly higher in the THD group. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the SH group compared with the THD group. Patients in the THD group returned to work or routine activities significantly later compared with patients in the SH group. The overall satisfaction rate was also higher in the SH group. Conclusion. Both procedures are simple and easy to perform for the treatment of grade III and IV hemorrhoids. SH showed better results in terms of lower rate of recurrence, lower postoperative pain, quicker return to work, and higher patient satisfaction.


2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1291-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Shih Huang ◽  
Chih-Chien Chin ◽  
Chong-Hung Yeh ◽  
Paul Y. Lin ◽  
Jeng-Yi Wang

Author(s):  
Ahmet Pergel ◽  
Ahmet Fikret Yücel ◽  
İbrahim Aydın ◽  
Dursun Ali Şahin

Author(s):  
Jonathan R. L. Wild ◽  
David G. Jayne

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document