Should Duration and Team Size Be Used for Effort Estimation?

Author(s):  
Takeshi Kakimoto ◽  
Masateru Tsunoda ◽  
Akito Monden
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley R. Staats ◽  
Katherine L. Milkman ◽  
Craig Fox
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Conte ◽  
H. E. Dunsmore ◽  
V. Y. Shen

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. DeRue ◽  
John R. Hollenbeck ◽  
Daniel R. Ilgen ◽  
Michael D. Johnson ◽  
Dustin K. Jundt
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Pytel ◽  
Alejandro Hossian ◽  
Paola Britos ◽  
Ramón García-Martínez

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Campbell

Abstract An important task for organizations is establishing truthful communication between parties with differing interests. This task is made particularly challenging when the accuracy of the information is poorly observed or not at all. In these settings, incentive contracts based on the accuracy of information will not be very effective. This paper considers an alternative mechanism that does not require any signal of the accuracy of any information communicated to provide incentives for truthful communication. Rather, an expert sacrifices future participation in decision-making to influence the current period’s decision in favour of their preferred project. This mechanism captures a notion often described as ‘political capital’ whereby an individual is able to achieve their own preferred decision in the current period at the expense of being able to exert influence in future decisions (‘spending political capital’). When the first-best is not possible in this setting, I show that experts hold more influence than under the first-best and that, in a multi-agent extension, a finite team size is optimal. Together these results suggest that a small number of individuals hold excessive influence in organizations.


Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1195
Author(s):  
Priya Varshini A G ◽  
Anitha Kumari K ◽  
Vijayakumar Varadarajan

Software Project Estimation is a challenging and important activity in developing software projects. Software Project Estimation includes Software Time Estimation, Software Resource Estimation, Software Cost Estimation, and Software Effort Estimation. Software Effort Estimation focuses on predicting the number of hours of work (effort in terms of person-hours or person-months) required to develop or maintain a software application. It is difficult to forecast effort during the initial stages of software development. Various machine learning and deep learning models have been developed to predict the effort estimation. In this paper, single model approaches and ensemble approaches were considered for estimation. Ensemble techniques are the combination of several single models. Ensemble techniques considered for estimation were averaging, weighted averaging, bagging, boosting, and stacking. Various stacking models considered and evaluated were stacking using a generalized linear model, stacking using decision tree, stacking using a support vector machine, and stacking using random forest. Datasets considered for estimation were Albrecht, China, Desharnais, Kemerer, Kitchenham, Maxwell, and Cocomo81. Evaluation measures used were mean absolute error, root mean squared error, and R-squared. The results proved that the proposed stacking using random forest provides the best results compared with single model approaches using the machine or deep learning algorithms and other ensemble techniques.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document