2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Daiva Kazlauskienė ◽  
Guoda Kiliuvienė ◽  
Palma Nenortienė ◽  
Giedrė Kasparavičienė ◽  
Ieva Matukaitytė

By conducting the toxicological analysis it is meaningful to determine the analytical system that could identify simultaneously several medicinal preparations quickly and precisely. The purpose of this work was to create and validate the method of thin-layer chromatography that would be suitable to separate the components of antidepressant mixture (amitriptyline hydrochloride, paroxetine hydrochloride, sertraline hydrochloride, fluvoxamine maleate and buspirone hydrochloride) and to identify them. The system was validated with regard to the sensitivity, repetition of data, resistance and particularity. The solvent systems with potential of high separation of components in their mixture were created: acetonitrile, methanol, ammonia solution 25 percent (85:10:5); acetonitrile, methanol, ammonia solution 25 percent (75:20:5); dichlormethane, 1,4-dioxane, ammonia solution 25 percent (50:45:5); dichlormethane, 1,4-dioxane, ammonia solution 25 percent (42:55:3); trichlormethane, 1,4-dioxane, ammonia solution 25 percent (25:70:5); trichlormethane, 1,4-dioxane, ammonia solution 25 percent (60:36:4). One of the most suitable solvent systems for separation of the analyzed mixture (sertraline, amitriptyline, paroxetine, buspirone, fluvoxamine) was determined – acetonitrile, methanol, ammonia solution 25 percent (85:10:5). When this solvent system was used, the average Rf values of the analyzed compounds differed the most. Validation was conducted – the relative standard deviation (RSD, percent) of the average Rf value of the analyzed compounds varied from 0,6 to 1,8 percent and did not exceed the permissible error of 5 percent. The sensitivity of methodology was determined by assessing the intensity of the mixture’s spots on the chromatographic plate. The detection limit of buspirone was 0,0012 µg; sertraline – 0,0008 µg; amitriptyline – 0,0004 µg; fluvoxamine – 0,0004 µg; paroxetine – 0,0008 µg. The resistance of results to the changed conditions – it was determined that when the amounts of the solvents acetonitrile and methanol were increased or decreased to two milliliters, the average Rf values of the analyzed compounds did not change statistically significantly


1994 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1135-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tunçel ◽  
G. Altiokka ◽  
Z. AtkoşsLar

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 536-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Amjadi ◽  
Jamshid Manzoori ◽  
Javad Hassanzadeh

AbstractThe surfactant to dye binding degree (SBDB) methodology was used to determine fluvoxamine maleate and citalopram hydrobromide. Neutral red and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) were used as the dye and surfactant, respectively, to form dye-surfactant aggregates. When a cationic drug is added to dye-surfactant mixture, it interacts with the surfactant and decreases the dye-surfactant binding degree. This decrease is proportional to the drug concentration. This was measured by monitoring the absorbance changes of the dye at 532 nm. Under the optimum conditions, the calibration graphs were linear over the range of 1.2–15 μg mL−1 and 1.1–15 μg mL−1 for fluvoxamine maleate and citalopram hydrobromide, respectively. The detection limits (signal to noise ratio = 3) were found to be 0.37 and 0.35 μg mL−1, for fluvoxamine maleate and citalopram hydrobromide, respectively.


1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Claghorn ◽  
Craig Q. Earl ◽  
Donna D. Walczak ◽  
Kim A. Stoner ◽  
Lung Fai Wong ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Dallé ◽  
Willie M.U. Daniels ◽  
Musa V. Mabandla
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Saravanan Devarajan ◽  
Gobinath Manavalan ◽  
Kumar Balasubramanian ◽  
Jayakumar Annamalai ◽  
Narasimhakumar Madduri

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.A. Abell ◽  
D.L. Farquhar ◽  
S.McL. Galloway ◽  
Fiona Steven ◽  
A.E. Philip ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document