Global Biomass Supply and Sustainable Development

Author(s):  
Lucia Beran ◽  
Harald Dyckhoff
Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 181
Author(s):  
M. Jean Blair ◽  
Bruno Gagnon ◽  
Andrew Klain ◽  
Biljana Kulišić

This work evaluates the relationships between bioenergy and related biomass supply chains and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Using Nilsson et al. (2016) seven-point scoring framework, the relationships between biomass supply for bioenergy and the SDGs were evaluated based on existing synthesis papers, modeling studies and empirical analyses, and expert knowledge. To complement this, contributions to SDG targets of 37 best practice case studies from around the world were documented. In reviewing these case studies, it was found that when supply chains are implemented appropriately and integrated with existing systems, they can have overwhelmingly positive contributions. Beyond directly contributing to SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), at least half of all case studies supported progress toward SDGs 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), and 12 (Responsible Production and Consumption); however, the ways in which supply chains contributed often differed. Agricultural biomass supply chains (energy crops and residues) were most likely to contribute to SDGs 2 (Zero Hunger) and 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), while waste and forest supply chains were most likely to contribute to SDG 15 (Life on Land). The development of bioenergy systems in rural and indigenous communities also indirectly supports societal SDGs such as SDGs 1 (No Poverty), 4 (Quality Education), 5 (Gender Inequality), and 10 (Reduced Inequalities). This work informs how SDGs can be used as a normative framework to guide the implementation of sustainable biomass supply chains, whether it is used for bioenergy or the broader bioeconomy. Recommendations for key stakeholders and topics for future work are also proposed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Rajdeep Golecha

<p>Sustainable development of the cellulosic biofuel sector will require biomass supply strategies that can minimize the cost of cellulosic biomass. While the conversion cost of cellulosic biofuel has come down significantly in the last decade, there has not been as significant change in biomass cost. Several studies have provided optimization models for minimizing biomass cost. However, most of the existing models have focused on a modelling approach to optimize a single component of biomass cost, using an integrated biomass transportation model. While separate studies have provided a model on farmer supply response that includes farmer participation and the incentives offered by biorefineries. However, there is a gap in understanding the linkage between transport cost, farmer participation and farmer incentives on biomass cost. As a result most optimization models available in literature are focused on reducing biomass transport cost. This study shows that a strong linkage exists between biomass transport cost and incentives offered to farmers. A holistic biomass supply model is developed that incorporates an integrated biomass transportation model, as well as the relationship between farmer incentives and farmer participation using data from some recent surveys. The holistic model enables a trade-off between increase in incentives and reduction in transport cost. This will help companies develop sustainable long term supply contracts between biorefineries and farmers. The study shows that biorefineries that focus on minimizing biomass cost through optimization of transport cost alone, without considering its relationships with farmer supply response will incur 15 to 20% higher biomass cost.</p>


Author(s):  
Peter Orebech ◽  
Fred Bosselman ◽  
Jes Bjarup ◽  
David Callies ◽  
Martin Chanock ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 549-551
Author(s):  
Basia Żaba

2011 ◽  
pp. 060211151757
Author(s):  
Cheryl Hogue

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document