Surgical Technique, Subaxial Spine: Cervical Disc Replacement Revision Surgery

2019 ◽  
pp. 349-354
Author(s):  
Justin A. Iorio ◽  
Stelios Koutsoumbelis ◽  
Han Jo Kim ◽  
Todd J. Albert
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement

165. Risk of revision surgery following cervical disc replacement vs anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: population based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S83
Author(s):  
James Youngjin Lee ◽  
Ruth Croxford ◽  
Jeremie Larouche ◽  
Paul A. Anderson ◽  
Joel A. Finkelstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement

Mechanical failure of the Mobi-C implant for artificial cervical disc replacement: report of 4 cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 727-733
Author(s):  
Jasmine A. T. DiCesare ◽  
Alexander M. Tucker ◽  
Irene Say ◽  
Kunal Patel ◽  
Todd H. Lanman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spondylosis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Dynamic Imaging ◽  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Artificial Disc ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement ◽  
Short And Long Term

Cervical spondylosis is one of the most commonly treated conditions in neurosurgery. Increasingly, cervical disc replacement (CDR) has become an alternative to traditional arthrodesis, particularly when treating younger patients. Thus, surgeons continue to gain a greater understanding of short- and long-term complications of arthroplasty. Here, the authors present a series of 4 patients initially treated with Mobi-C artificial disc implants who developed postoperative neck pain. Dynamic imaging revealed segmental kyphosis at the level of the implant. All implants were locked in the flexion position, and all patients required reoperation. This is the first reported case series of symptomatic segmental kyphosis after CDR.

P120. Risk factors for failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference following cervical disc replacement

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S199
Author(s):  
Ryan Lee ◽  
Avani S. Vaishnav ◽  
Hikari Urakawa ◽  
Jung Mok ◽  
Philip Louie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Minimal Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement ◽  
Clinically Important Difference

scholarly journals Cervical disc replacement surgery: indications, technique, and technical pearls

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dante Leven ◽  
Joshua Meaike ◽  
Kris Radcliff ◽  
Sheeraz Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement ◽  
Replacement Surgery

scholarly journals Cervical sagittal alignment after Prestige LP cervical disc replacement: radiological results and clinical impacts from a single-center experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Wang ◽  
Yang Meng ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Beiyu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Sagittal Alignment ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been widely used to treat one- and two-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Studies have shown the effectiveness of CDR in preserving range of motion (ROM) and delaying adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Cervical sagittal alignment is an important factor affecting favorable clinical outcomes in cervical spine surgery. This study aimed to explore whether cervical sagittal alignment can be maintained after CDR and to identify the impact of cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes after CDR. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study. 132 patients who underwent one-level CDR were included. Cervical sagittal alignments, including cervical lordosis (CL), segmental alignment (SA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1s), and T1s minus CL (T1s-CL), were measured. The effects of cervical sagittal alignment on the CDR outcomes were analyzed. Patients were divided into the heterotopic ossification (HO) group and ASD group to determine the potential impacts of cervical sagittal parameters. Results The cervical sagittal alignment parameters, except for the SVA, were significantly improved after CDR and showed decreasing trends at the last follow-up. Significantly higher CL and T1s were found in patients with better ROM after CDR. SVA ≥ 20 mm increased the risk of anterior HO (odds ratio = 2.945, P = 0.007). Significantly kyphotic SA and lower T1s values were found in the ASD patients than in the non-ASD patients (P < 0.05). Patients with ASD at the inferior level showed significantly worse CL (P < 0.05). Conclusion CDR had limited function of improving cervical sagittal alignment. Poor cervical sagittal alignment after CDR was associated with HO, ASD, and less ROM.

Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 551-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan W.B. Peng ◽  
Martin Quirnoa ◽  
John A. Bendo ◽  
Jeffrey M. Spivak ◽  
Jeffrey A. Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement ◽  
Intervertebral Disc Height

scholarly journals A Case of Dislocation of Anterior Cervical Disc Replacement

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-307
Author(s):  
Isao Kitahara ◽  
Nobusuke Kobayashi ◽  
Hiroaki Shirotori ◽  
Munehisa Shinozaki ◽  
Ken Ishii
Keyword(s):  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Replacement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document