Optimization of Scaling Factors for Image Watermarking Using Harmony Search Algorithm

2018 ◽  
pp. 422-434
Author(s):  
Anurag Mishra ◽  
Charu Agarwal ◽  
Girija Chetty
Keyword(s):  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Image Watermarking ◽  
Harmony Search ◽  
Harmony Search Algorithm ◽  
Scaling Factors

Optimal linear cooperation spectrum sensing method based on chaos harmony search algorithm

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 2412-2417
Author(s):  
Yue-hong LI ◽  
Pin WAN ◽  
Yong-hua WANG ◽  
Jian YANG ◽  
Qin DENG
Keyword(s):  
Spectrum Sensing ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Harmony Search ◽  
Harmony Search Algorithm ◽  
Optimal Linear

Performance Study of Harmony Search Algorithm for Multilevel Thresholding

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salima Ouadfel ◽  
Abdelmalik Taleb-Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Harmony Search ◽  
Harmony Search Algorithm ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Multilevel Thresholding ◽  
Performance Study ◽  
Bacterial Foraging Optimization ◽  
Bee Colony ◽  
Fitness Value ◽  
Multiple Thresholds

AbstractThresholding is the easiest method for image segmentation. Bi-level thresholding is used to create binary images, while multilevel thresholding determines multiple thresholds, which divide the pixels into multiple regions. Most of the bi-level thresholding methods are easily extendable to multilevel thresholding. However, the computational time will increase with the increase in the number of thresholds. To solve this problem, many researchers have used different bio-inspired metaheuristics to handle the multilevel thresholding problem. In this paper, optimal thresholds for multilevel thresholding in an image are selected by maximizing three criteria: Between-class variance, Kapur and Tsallis entropy using harmony search (HS) algorithm. The HS algorithm is an evolutionary algorithm inspired from the individual improvisation process of the musicians in order to get a better harmony in jazz music. The proposed algorithm has been tested on a standard set of images from the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset. The results are then compared with that of genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), bacterial foraging optimization (BFO), and artificial bee colony algorithm (ABC). Results have been analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively using the fitness value and the two popular performance measures: SSIM and FSIM indices. Experimental results have validated the efficiency of the HS algorithm and its robustness against GA, PSO, and BFO algorithms. Comparison with the well-known metaheuristic ABC algorithm indicates the equal performance for all images when the number of thresholds M is equal to two, three, four, and five. Furthermore, ABC has shown to be the most stable when the dimension of the problem is too high.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document