scholarly journals Staying Well Grounded in Markerless Motion Capture

Author(s):  
Bodo Rosenhahn ◽  
Christian Schmaltz ◽  
Thomas Brox ◽  
Joachim Weickert ◽  
Hans-Peter Seidel
2021 ◽  
pp. 110414
Author(s):  
Robert M. Kanko ◽  
Elise K. Laende ◽  
Gerda Strutzenberger ◽  
Marcus Brown ◽  
W. Scott Selbie ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 156-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Corazza ◽  
Lars Mündermann ◽  
Emiliano Gambaretto ◽  
Giancarlo Ferrigno ◽  
Thomas P. Andriacchi

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Mündermann ◽  
Stefano Corazza ◽  
Ajit M. Chaudhari ◽  
Thomas P. Andriacchi ◽  
Aravind Sundaresan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Argyro Kotsifaki ◽  
Rodney Whiteley ◽  
Clint Hansen

ObjectivesTo determine whether a dual-camera markerless motion capture system can be used for lower limb kinematic evaluation in athletes in a preseason screening setting.DesignDescriptive laboratory study.SettingLaboratory setting.ParticipantsThirty-four (n=34) healthy athletes.Main outcome measuresThree dimensional lower limb kinematics during three functional tests: Single Leg Squat (SLS), Single Leg Jump, Modified Counter-movement Jump. The tests were simultaneously recorded using both a marker-based motion capture system and two Kinect v2 cameras using iPi Mocap Studio software.ResultsExcellent agreement between systems for the flexion/extension range of motion of the shin during all tests and for the thigh abduction/adduction during SLS were seen. For peak angles, results showed excellent agreement for knee flexion. Poor correlation was seen for the rotation movements.ConclusionsThis study supports the use of dual Kinect v2 configuration with the iPi software as a valid tool for assessment of sagittal and frontal plane hip and knee kinematic parameters but not axial rotation in athletes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document