A Bio-inspired Evolutionary Approach to Identifying Minimal Length Decision Rules in Emotional Usability Engineering

2009 ◽  
pp. 181-187
Author(s):  
Ikno Kim ◽  
Junzo Watada
Keyword(s):  
Decision Rules ◽  
Minimal Length ◽  
Evolutionary Approach ◽  
Usability Engineering

Cognitive gadgets: A provocative but flawed manifesto

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice
Keyword(s):  
Theory Of Mind ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Twin Studies ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Evolutionary Approach ◽  
Genetic Inheritance ◽  
Double Standards ◽  
Cross Cultural Differences ◽  
Cherry Picking ◽  
Dichotomous Thinking

Abstract The argument against innatism at the heart of Cognitive Gadgets is provocative but premature, and is vitiated by dichotomous thinking, interpretive double standards, and evidence cherry-picking. I illustrate my criticism by addressing the heritability of imitation and mindreading, the relevance of twin studies, and the meaning of cross-cultural differences in theory of mind development. Reaching an integrative understanding of genetic inheritance, plasticity, and learning is a formidable task that demands a more nuanced evolutionary approach.

Perceptions of Group Decision Rules and Group Decisions

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Miller ◽  
Yohsuke Ohtsubo
Keyword(s):  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Rules ◽  
Group Decisions

Six GPA Decision Rules and Adverse Impact in Initial Screening

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Carlson ◽  
Mary L. Connerley ◽  
Arlise P. McKinney ◽  
Ross L. Mecham
Keyword(s):  
Decision Rules ◽  
Adverse Impact ◽  
Initial Screening
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document