Parasitic Bat Flies (Diptera: Streblidae and Nycteribiidae): Host Specificity and Potential as Vectors

Author(s):  
Carl W. Dick ◽  
Katharina Dittmar
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Maria Camila N. Obdianela ◽  
Ma. Patricia Venice V. Guanlao ◽  
Essex Vladimer E. Samaniego ◽  
Kathleen O. Pornobi
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Estrada-Villegas ◽  
Tanja K. Halczok ◽  
Marco Tschapka ◽  
Rachel A. Page ◽  
Stefan D. Brändel ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zong Xian Lim ◽  
Alan T. Hitch ◽  
Benjamin P. Y.-H. Lee ◽  
Dolyce H.W. Low ◽  
Erica Sena Neves ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 616-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah M ter Hofstede ◽  
M Brock Fenton ◽  
John O Whitaker, Jr.

Ectoparasite host specificity can be influenced by factors such as the degree of host isolation and ectoparasite mobility. Host-site specificity can result from factors such as proximity to mates, competition, and host grooming behaviour. Ectoparasitic bat flies on bats from the Lamanai area of Belize were collected from hosts captured in mist nets to determine host specificity and host-site specificity. Bat grooming behaviour was also recorded and quantified. From 455 bats (25 species in five families), 773 bat flies (32 species in two families) were collected. Of 32 bat fly species, 25 were only found on 1 bat species, 6 were found on 2 species of the same genus, and 1 was found on 2 species of different genera (the latter appearing to be an accidental association). Specificity of the bat flies tended to follow the taxonomy of the bat hosts, not the ecological isolation of the host species, since bat species that often roost in polyspecific groups did not share bat fly species. Mobility of the bat flies was not related to host specificity. Host-site specificity of bat flies occurred for either fur or membrane on the host, and long hind legs and ctenidia appear to be morphological adaptations for living in fur. Bat grooming behaviour was consistent with the assumptions of a simulation model, which suggested that host grooming could be responsible for host-site segregation of bat flies.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pejić Brankaa ◽  
Budinski Ivana ◽  
van Schaik Jaap ◽  
Blagojević Jelena

Abstract Schreiber’s bent-winged bat Miniopterus schreibersii and the greater horseshoe bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum are widespread and common cavernicolous species across southern Europe that host numerous specialized ectoparasite species. The objective of this study was to characterize the species assemblage, genetic diversity and host specificity of bat flies (Nycteribiidae, Diptera) and wing mites (Spinturnicidae, Acari) found on these bat hosts in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Notably, while bat flies lay puparia on the cave walls and can thus be transmitted indirectly, wing mites require direct body contact for transmission. Morphological identification and sequencing of a 710-bp fragment of cytochrome oxidase I gene of 207 bat flies yielded four species, three on M. schreibersii and one on R. ferrumequinum. Sequencing of a 460-bp small subunit ribosomal RNA fragment, in all 190 collected wing mites revealed two species, one per host. In no case was a parasite associated with one host found on the other host. Species and genetic diversity of flies were higher in M. schreibersii, likely reflecting their host’s larger colony sizes and migratory potential. Mite species of both hosts showed similarly low diversity, likely due to their faster life history and lower winter survival. Our findings highlight a remarkably high host-specificity and segregation of ectoparasite species despite direct contact among their hosts in the roost, suggesting a defined host preference in the investigated ectoparasite species. Furthermore, the differences in ectoparasite genetic diversity exemplify the interplay between host and parasite life histories in shaping parasite population genetic structure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document