Extracting Novel Features for E-Commerce Page Quality Classification

2013 ◽  
pp. 481-492
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Lanfen Lin ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Penghua Yu ◽  
Jiaolong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Classification

Surface water quality classification using data mining approaches: Irrigation along the Aladag River*

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Taghi Sattari ◽  
Hajar Feizi ◽  
Muslume Sevba Colak ◽  
Ahmet Ozturk ◽  
Fazli Ozturk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Surface Water ◽  
Surface Water Quality ◽  
Quality Classification ◽  
Water Quality Classification ◽  
Using Data

scholarly journals An Overview on Water Quality Trending for Lake Water Classification in Malaysia

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3.23) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Muhammad Muzzammil Shahabudin ◽  
Sabariah Musa
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
Lake Water ◽  
Quality Index ◽  
Water Quality Assessment ◽  
Lake Water Quality ◽  
Water Classification ◽  
Quality Classification ◽  
Water Quality Classification ◽  
Quality Assessments

Lake water is important to all life and surroundings with multiples benefits and forms either in natural or man-made conditions. One of the most well-known tools for assessing the water quality is Water Quality Index (WQI) and widely used including Malaysia. Lake water quality should be represented in lucid way like other surface water regarding to the WQI standards for water quality assessment on lakes. This paper aims to review on lake water quality classification and its uses based on WQI standards in Malaysia. In this review, the uses of WQI for assessing the lake water and functioned of lakes are discussed. Results on pH from 5.0 to 9.2, BOD in mg/l from 0 to 180, COD in mg/l from 5 to 150, SS in mg/l from o to 1800, DO in mg/l from 0 to 8 and AN in mg/l N from -1 to 26. Variety of numbers is due to different loading of pollutions and location. With used of WQI on lake water quality assessments, further action can be taken for the uses on water resources by maintaining the quality. It also will broaden the uses of lake water as alternative of water resources in Malaysia.  

P–132 Centralized versus local embryologists scoring of blastocyst quality obtained in a large European multicenter clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Montag ◽  
E Va. de. Abbeel ◽  
T Ebner ◽  
P Larsson ◽  
B Mannaerts
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Data Storage ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Quality Classification ◽  
Blastocyst Quality ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Local Assessment

Abstract Study question Does blastocyst quality scoring by central assessment deviate from local assessment and potentially lead to the selection of a different single blastocyst for transfer? Summary answer Central and local assessment provided the same quality classification (poor / good / top) in 69% of all blastocysts and 63% of all transferred blastocysts. What is known already Blastocyst quality is scored most frequently by three morphological parameters, namely expansion and hatching (EH) status, inner cell mass (ICM) grading and trophectoderm (TE) grading. The score is used to define the quality classification (poor / good / top) which determines which embryo is to be transferred or cryopreserved. Blastocyst scoring and grading can be highly subjective, which does influence the choice for transfer and cryopreservation. Time-lapse imaging technology captures additional input about embryo development as well as enables centralized data storage and sharing for independent central assessments. Study design, size, duration Pooled embryo analysis from a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial (RAINBOW) of 619 women undergoing ovarian stimulation with an individualized dose of follitropin delta in a long GnRH agonist protocol between May 2018 and January 2020. Blastocysts were centrally assessed using time-lapse images by two independent assessors and one adjudicator . Selection of the blastocyst for transfer by local assessment was based on morphological scoring and not on morphokinetic time-lapse parameters. Participants/materials, setting, methods Oocytes were fertilized by ICSI and cultured in the Embryoscopeâ (Vitrolife) up to day 5 for transfer or day 5/6 for cryopreservation. Embryos were assessed as either non-blastocyst or blastocyst. Blastocysts were graded centrally and locally at 116 hrs of development, based on EH status (1–6), ICM (A-D) and TE grading (A-D). Central assessors were blinded to local assessment and embryo transfer selection. Main results and the role of chance In total 4282 embryos were assessed centrally, of which 2046 day 5 embryos (48%) were adjudicated due to a scoring difference of at least one parameter between the two central assessors. In total 38% of day 5 embryos were judged as non-blastocysts and 62% as blastocysts of which 61% (i.e. 38% of all embryos) were determined to be of good or top quality. Identical results in terms of quality classification (poor / good / top) were obtained for 69% of blastocysts between local and central assessment and in 78%, between the two central assessors. Moreover, central and local scoring were identical in 62% for EH status, 53% for ICM grading and 57% for TE grading. For all transferred blastocysts (n = 508), central and local quality assessment was aligned for 63%. The ongoing pregnancy rate following single blastocyst transfer (SBT) was 41% (202/489), and similar to when considering only the transfers for which the central assessment had the same or a higher classification than the local assessment (166/411=40%). In 16% of all SBT, central quality assessment gave a lower score for the transferred blastocyst than the central assessment. This discrepancy could potentially have led to transfer of a different blastocyst. Limitations, reasons for caution This trial included assessments made by embryologists from 20 IVF centres. Some centres has limited experience with time-lapse technology for morphological blastocyst scoring. Scoring could therefore have been affected by differences in focal planes, magnification and contrast compared to inverted microscopy, with potential influence on blastocyst scores and quality classification. Wider implications of the findings: Local and central blastocyst quality classification based on morphology aligns well but remains subjective. Embryo assessment may benefit from using tools like artificial intelligence-based algorithms for a more objective analysis. Trial registration number NCT03564509

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document