Higher-order Monotone Functions and Probability Theory

Author(s):  
Dinis D. Pestana ◽  
Sandra Mendonça
1991 ◽  
Vol 20 (359) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanne Riis Nielson ◽  
Flemming Nielson

In the context of abstract interpretation for languages without higher-order features we study the number of times a functional need to be unfolded in order to give the least fixed point. For the cases of total or monotone functions we obtain an exponential bound and in the case of strict and additive (or distributive) functions we obtain a quadratic bound. These bounds are shown to be tight in that sufficiently long chains of functions can be shown to exist. Specializing the case of strict and additive functions to functionals of a form that would correspond to iterative programs we show that a linear bound is tight. This is related to several analyses studied in the literature (including strictness analysis).


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kovačec ◽  
Miguel M. R. Moreira ◽  
David P. Martins

AbstractAlon and Yuster give for independent identically distributed real or vector valued random variables X, Y combinatorially proved estimates of the form Prob(∥X − Y∥ ≤ b) ≤ c Prob(∥X − Y∥ ≤ a). We derive these using copositive matrices instead. By the same method we also give estimates for the real valued case, involving X + Y and X − Y, due to Siegmund-Schultze and von Weizsäcker as generalized by Dong, Li and Li. Furthermore, we formulate a version of the above inequalities as an integral inequality for monotone functions.


Author(s):  
Andrew Bacon

Hartry Field has recently suggested that a non-standard probability calculus better represents our beliefs about vague matters. His theory has two notable features: (i) that your attitude to P when you are certain that P is higher-order borderline ought to be the same as your attitude when you are certain that P is simply borderline, and (ii) that when you are certain that P is borderline you should have no credence in P and no credence in ~. This chapter rejects both elements of this view and advocates instead for the view that when you are in possession of all the possible evidence, and it is borderline whether P is borderline, it is borderline whether you should believe P. Secondly, it argues for probabilism: the view that your credences ought to conform to the probability calculus. To get a handle on these issues, the chapter looks at Dutch book arguments and comparative axiomatizations of probability theory.


Author(s):  
Mihály Bessenyei ◽  
Zsolt Páles

The Hermite-Hadamard inequality not only is a consequence of convexity but also characterizes it: if a continuous function satisfies either its left-hand side or its right-hand side on each compact subinterval of the domain, then it is necessarily convex. The aim of this paper is to prove analogous statements for the higher-order extensions of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality. The main tools of the proofs are smoothing by convolution and the support properties of higher-order monotone functions.


In this chapter, the authors make use of the formalizations of measure theory and Lebesgue integration in HOL4 to provide a higher-order-logic formalization of probability theory (Mhamdi, 2013). For illustration purposes, they also present the probabilistic analysis of the Heavy Hitter problem using HOL.


As discussed in the previous chapter, the fundamental theories of measure and Lebesgue integration are the prerequisites for the formalization of probability theory in higher-order logic. The scope of this chapter is primarily the formalization of these foundations. Both formalizations of measure theory and Lebesgue integral (Mhamdi, Hasan, & Tahar, 2011), presented in this chapter, are based on the extended-real numbers. This allows us to define sigma-finite and even infinite measures and handle extended-real-valued measurable functions. It also allows us to verify the properties of the Lebesgue integral and its convergence theorems for arbitrary functions. Therefore, the chapter begins with a description of the formalization of extended real numbers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Povinelli ◽  
Gabrielle C. Glorioso ◽  
Shannon L. Kuznar ◽  
Mateja Pavlic

Abstract Hoerl and McCormack demonstrate that although animals possess a sophisticated temporal updating system, there is no evidence that they also possess a temporal reasoning system. This important case study is directly related to the broader claim that although animals are manifestly capable of first-order (perceptually-based) relational reasoning, they lack the capacity for higher-order, role-based relational reasoning. We argue this distinction applies to all domains of cognition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document