How Physiological and Pathophysiological Factors Influence the Pharmacokinetics and Analgesic Effect of Opiates in Cancer Patients

Author(s):  
Lennart K. Paalzow
1992 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 252???253
Author(s):  
N. A. OSIPOVA ◽  
G. A. NOVIKOV ◽  
V. A. BERESNEY ◽  
N. A. LOSEVA

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Mercadante ◽  
Edoardo Arcuri ◽  
Walter Tirelli ◽  
Alessandra Casuccio

Author(s):  
O. Solodyannikova ◽  
◽  
V. Danilenko ◽  
G. Sukach ◽  
◽  
...  

Objective. The study objective was to investigate and compare the effectiveness of different radiopharmaceuticals in the treatment of metastatic bone disease. Materials and methods. Cancer patients (n = 150, average age (55 ± 11.6) years, 95 females, 55 males) having got various primary tumors and metastatic bone disease were given medical treatment at the Department of Nuclear Medicine of the National Institute of Cancer. The 153Sm, 32Р, and 89Sr radiopharmaceutical agents produced by the «Radiopreparats» enterprise (Republic of Uzbekistan) and Radioisotope Centre Polatom (National Centre for Nuclear Research, Poland) were administered to the patients. There were cases of breast cancer (n = 75), prostate cancer (n = 45), lung cancer (n = 10), kidney cancer (n = 4), cervical cancer (n = 5), and rectosigmoid cancer (n = 11) among the treated subjects. In 135 patients (90 %) the bone metastases were detected by osteoscintigraphy with 99мTc- monodiphosphonate. In 15 cases the diagnosis of metastatic bone disease was verified by other radiology methods. Results. The pain intensity rating scale (LACOMED) was used to assay the analgesic effect of various radiopharmaceuticals in metastatic bone disease. Results of treatment with 32P, 89Sr, and 153Sm were included in a comparative analysis procedure. It was established that the level of pain syndrome ranged from 7–8 points on the LACOMED scale before treatment. Upon administration of radionuclide therapy the level of pain was reduced down to 3–5 points, namely with 32P therapy it has decreased by 30.7 %, with 89Sr by 33.2 %, and with 153Sm by 41.5 % respectively. Time pattern of 153Sm analgesic effectiveness was studied depending on the number of treatment sessions. The best value of analgesic effect of 153Sm was registered after the first treatment session with a tendency to decrease after the second and significantly lower analgesic effects after the third session. Tolerance of 153Sm was rated on the CTCNCA (v) 4.3 scale. The best tolerance was peculiar to 153Sm corresponding to the «good» level according to a point assessment. When using 89Sr the drug tolerance was lower, not requiring however the drug discontinuation. The 32P radiopharmaceutical featured the lowest tolerance approaching the «satisfactory» rating. In 11 patients upon that the side effects were found significantly impairing the patient’s status, accordingly some extra measures were required. No decision to cancel the drug administration was made. Conclusions. Radionuclide therapy with 153Sm-oxabiphor agent can be used in the complex treatment of metastatic bone disease in cancer patients having got tumors of different localization. 153Sm-oxabiphor is the most effective and best tolerable radiopharmaceutical agent in the pain treatment in metastatic bone disease in comparison with 32P and 89Sr preparations (р < 0.05). Key words: metastatic bone disease, radionuclide therapy, phosphorus-32, strontium-89, samarium-153.


1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 577-583
Author(s):  
Mogens Kjaer ◽  
Henning Nielsen ◽  
Flemming E. Olsen ◽  
Lars S. Andersen ◽  
Jette Philipsen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhonghai Zhao ◽  
Bin Lv ◽  
Xiaodong Zhao ◽  
Yunlong Zhang

AbstractObjective: To study the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the OPRM1 and ABCB1 genes on the analgesic effect and consumption of sufentanil after thoracoscopic-assisted radical resection of lung cancer.Methods: A total of 225 Chinese Han nationality patients undergoing thoracoscopic-assisted radical resection of lung cancer were enrolled in the present study. Among them, 132 were males (58.67%) and 93 (41.33%) were females having American Society of Anesthesiologists statuses classified as grades I or II. The rs1799971, rs563649 and rs1323040 genotypes of the OPRM1 gene and rs2032582, rs1045642 and rs1128503 genotypes of the ABCB1 gene were detected by Sanger sequencing. The state anxiety index and pressure pain threshold were assessed preoperatively. Sufentanil was administered intravenously to maintain anesthesia. The doses and side effects of sufentanil consumed 6 h (T1), 24 h (T2) and 48 h (T3) after surgery were recorded.Results: The sufentanil doses at T1, T2 and T3 were significantly higher in radical-operation lung cancer patients with mutant homozygous rs1799971 and rs1323040 loci in the OPRM1 gene and rs2032582 and rs1128503 loci in the ABCB1 gene. The doses of sufentanil consumed by mutant heterozygous lung cancer patients at T1, T2 and T3 were significantly higher than those consumed by patients without mutations, and the differences were statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). There was no significant difference in sufentanil doses consumed by lung cancer patients with mutant homozygous, mutant heterozygous and wild-type rs563649 locus of the OPRM1 gene and rs1045642 locus of the ABCB1 gene at T1, T2 and T3 (P&gt;0.05). There was no significant difference in the visual analog scale scores at T1, T2 and T3 for different genotypes of OPRM1 and ABCB1 genes in lung cancer patients (P&gt;0.05). No significant difference was found between the adverse reactions of OPRM1 and ABCB1 genotypes in patients undergoing radical resection of lung cancer (P&gt;0.05).Conclusion: The rs1799971 and rs1323040 polymorphisms of the OPRM1 gene and rs2032582 and rs1128503 polymorphisms of the ABCB1 gene are related to the analgesic effect and consumed dose of sufentanil in Chinese Han patients undergoing radical operation of lung cancer.


1992 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 252???253
Author(s):  
N. A. OSIPOVA ◽  
G. A. NOVIKOV ◽  
V. A. BERESNEY ◽  
N. A. LOSEVA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document