scholarly journals PI Toolset Methodology for Virtual Enterprise Performance Assessment and Governance

Author(s):  
Mohammadreza Heydari ◽  
Christian Zanetti ◽  
Marco Taisch ◽  
Margherita Peruzzini
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Shi ◽  
Josu Takala ◽  
Matti Muhos ◽  
Jyrki Poikkimaki ◽  
Yang Chen

Abstract It is a core content of enterprise performance research evaluating and comparing enterprise performance in dynamic environment. In allusion to this problem, a variety of enterprise performance assessment methods and indexes systems are proposed. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a kind of effective mathematical model which is used for comparing the performance among enterprises or different units inside an enterprise, based on the real-world data. Through comparing the performance, DEA can evaluate the enterprise performance from scale effectiveness and technological effectiveness, and then get the performance optimization goals. Critical Factor Index (CFI) is a new enterprise performance assessment method proposed in recent years. This method, based on the performance perception of business leaders or staffs, evaluates the enterprise performance in different dimensions, and then gets the optimization strategy of enterprise resource allocation to improve integrated enterprise performance. This paper has structured a new evaluation and optimization system for performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which combine properly the DEA and CFI method to evaluate and optimize the SMEs’ performance comprehensively, and has confirm this system with data of 5 Finnish SMEs.


1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Jones ◽  
Eduardo Salas ◽  
Elizabeth W. Pitts ◽  
Gary L. Allen ◽  
Ben B. Morgan

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Lindelius ◽  
E Björkenstam ◽  
C Dahlgren ◽  
R Ljung ◽  
C Stefansson

2018 ◽  
pp. 32-51
Author(s):  
R. Yu. Kochnev ◽  
L. I. Polishchuk ◽  
A. Yu. Rubin

We present the comparative analysis of the impact of centralized and decentralized corruption for private sector. Theory and empirical evidence point out to a “double jeopardy” of decentralized corruption which increases the burden of corruption upon private firms and weakens the incentives of bureaucracy to provide public production inputs, such as infrastructure. These outcomes are produced by simultaneous free-riding and the tragedy of the commons effects. The empirical part of the paper utilizes data of the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance project.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document