Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

Author(s):  
Rajesh Khullar
2002 ◽  
Vol 168 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Zieren ◽  
Heiko Neuss ◽  
Andrew W. Philipp ◽  
Jochen M. Müller

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lysanne van Silfhout ◽  
Ludo van Hout ◽  
Myrthe Jolles ◽  
Hilco P. Theeuwes ◽  
Willem J.V. Bökkerink ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim To report feasibility and surgical outcomes of recurrent inguinal hernia repair after TransInguinal PrePeritoneal (TIPP) repair. Material and Methods Patients who underwent recurrent IHR after TIPP between January 2013 and January 2015 in a single hernia-dedicated teaching hospital were included. Exclusion criteria were femoral hernia, incarcerated hernia and reasons for unreliable follow-up. Electronic medical records were assessed retrospectively to register surgical outcomes and complications. Results Thirty-three patients underwent surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernia after TIPP. Twenty patients were treated with a “re-TIPP when possible” strategy; resulting in 13 successful re-tipps and 7 conversions to Lichtenstein repair. Eleven patients underwent primarily a Lichtenstein’s repair, the remaining two patients underwent recurrent IHR using other techniques (transrectus sheath Pre-Peritoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal repair). Mean time of surgery was 44.7 minutes (standard deviation 16.7). There was one patient (3.0%) with a re-recurrent inguinal hernia during follow-up. Other minor complications included urinary tract infection. There were no significant differences in post-operative results between the different surgical techniques used for recurrent IHR. Conclusions These results indicate that after TIPP it is feasible and safe to perform re-surgery for recurrence with an anterior approach again. For these recurrences, a Lichtenstein can be performed, or a ‘re-TIPP if possible’ strategy can be applied by experienced TIPP surgeons. Whether a re-TIPP has the same advantages over Lichtenstein as is for primary inguinal hernia surgery, needs to be evaluated in a prospective manner.


2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 2657-2662
Author(s):  
Yoneei KAWAGUCHI ◽  
Jun YAMADA ◽  
Daisuke SOUMA ◽  
Yoshirou KUBOTA

1965 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 1003-1005
Author(s):  
Arnaldo Yódice

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 13-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshikatsu Nitta ◽  
Takashi Kinoshita ◽  
Jun Kataoka ◽  
Masato Ohta ◽  
Kensuke Fujii ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (7) ◽  
pp. 493-495
Author(s):  
L Smith ◽  
D Magowan ◽  
R Singh ◽  
BM Stephenson

Background Sutured inguinal hernia repairs are now uncommon, with evidence suggesting that those augmented with mesh are associated with a lower recurrence rate. We aimed to explore the suggestion that the established use of mesh does indeed lower the rate of operation for recurrence in a single National Health Service region. Method We collected retrospective Office of Population Censuses and Surveys coded data across one region of all primary and recurrent inguinal hernia repairs over 15 years (2004–2019). Electronic records of recurrent repairs were scrutinised to identify year and type of previous primary repair. Results In total, 7,234 repairs were performed during this time, of which 289 (4%) were for symptomatic recurrence. Operations for primary repair increased year on year (111 in 2004 to 402 in 2019). Frequency of operation for recurrent herniation declined with increasing use of mesh (8.8% in 2004 to 3.5% in 2019). The majority of repairs (73%) for recurrence were by an open approach. As opposed to an open mesh repair, a primary laparoscopic repair was associated with an earlier recurrence. Conclusions Inguinal hernia repairs are increasing in frequency but operations for later symptomatic recurrence following an open primary prosthetic mesh repair are not.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document