Logic and Reasoning Patterns

Author(s):  
K. R. Chowdhary
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian Wu ◽  
Tianlong Zu ◽  
Elise Agra ◽  
N. Sanjay Rebello

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anitha Alnervik ◽  
Gunilla Svidén

Five qualified occupational therapists and their patients were videotaped during a treatment session. The occupational therapists first were asked to describe the session in a narrative form, i.e., “tell the story,” and then they were asked to describe the thoughts and considerations on which they had conducted the treatment session, i.e., “reflection on practice.” A qualitative analysis was performed in accordance with the model for clinical reasoning developed by Fleming (1991). Both quantitative and qualitative analysis showed that procedural reasoning was predominant both in storytelling and reflection on practice, and a very small number of comments was classified as interactive or conditional reasoning. The results of this preliminary investigation suggested that we should examine the role that reflection on practice plays in examining, developing, and teaching the art of occupational therapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
Asmarsha Qathrinada , ◽  
Pranoto ,

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to find out how legal protection is provided to passengers in commercial air transport <br />activities in Indonesia, especially regarding airline responsibilities to passengers and the compensation <br />provided in case of flight delays due to negligence of the carrier. This research is performed with legal <br />research, using prescriptive characteristic. The research is using statute approach by reviewing the <br />regulations related to the issues. The source of the research is derived from primary legal materials namely <br />legislation, secondary materials from legal literatures, as well as tertiary or non-legal legal material. The <br />collection of legal materials was done by literature studies, and analyzed with deductive reasoning patterns. <br />Based on the result of the research, it can be concluded that the regulation of compensations given by <br />the airlines to passengers has been quite well regulated in the Minister of Transportation Regulation <br />No. 89 of 2015, but in the implementation, the government is still less firm in cracking down on airlines <br />that do not carry out their responsibility of the compensation regulated in Regulation of the Minister of <br />Transportation Number 77 in year 2011.<br />Keywords: compensation; flight delay; commercial air transportation.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada penumpang <br />dalam kegiatan angkutan udara komersial di Indonesia, khususnya mengenai tanggung jawab maskapai <br />penerbangan terhadap penumpang serta apa kompensasi yang diberikan apabila terjadi penundaan <br />penerbangan karena kelalaian pihak pengangkut. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan penelitian hukum dan <br />bersifat preskriptif. Pendekatan penelitian berupa pendekatan undang-undang dengan menelaah regulasi <br />yang besangkutan dengan isu yang penulis angkat dalam penulisan ini. Sumber penelitian berasal dari <br />bahan hukum primer yaitu perundang-undangan, bahan sekunder dari kepustakaan hukum, serta bahan <br />hukum tersier atau non-hukum. Pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan, dan <br />menganalisis dengan pola penalaran deduktif.  Berdasarkan hasil penelitian maka dapat disimpulkan <br />bahwa  pengaturan  mengenai  kompensasi  yang  diberikan  oleh  maskapai  penerbangan  terhadap <br />penumpang  telah cukup  baik  diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 89 Tahun 2015, <br />namun dalam pelaksanaannya pemerintah masih kurang tegas dalam menindak maskapai yang tidak <br />melaksanakan tanggung jawabnya untuk memberikan kompensasi sesuai dengan Peraturan Menteri <br />Perhubungan Nomor 77 Tahun 2011.<br />Kata kunci: kompensasi; keterlambatan penerbangan; pengangkutan udara komersial.</p>


1980 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. Aiello‐Nicosia ◽  
M. Di Giacomo‡ ◽  
A. Machi‡ ◽  
R. M. Sperandeo‐Mineo ◽  
M. A. Valenza ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-231
Author(s):  
Anne Kristine Byhring

In these student dialogues, deliberative aspects of argumentation in SSI inquiry are documented as different from strictly scientific argumentation. I suggest that deliberative argumentation is a complex alternation between reasoning patterns that relate to different activity layers. This understanding of deliberative argumentation emerged when analyzing students’ dialogues, developing the categories theme (theoria), inquiry (praxis) and inscribing (poeisis). Analyses are presented to account for this emerging understanding. The analyses utilize social functional linguistics (SFL), pragmatic conversation analysis, and rhetorical approaches to argumentation. What characterizes the students’ oral deliberation is an alternation between certain foci. Roberts’s (2011) use the terms theoria, praxis, and techne to characterize similar reasoning patterns in his Vision 1 and 2 of scientific literacy. I suggest that in civic deliberation all patterns of reasoning are necessary to handle SSI, whereas in strictly scientific argumentation, theoria is dominant. Such distinctions should also be considered when analyzing and developing instructional strategies.


1982 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann E. McCabe ◽  
Linda S. Siegel ◽  
Ian Spence ◽  
Alex Wilkinson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document