Applications to Second-Order Vector Fields and Finsler Metrics

2003 ◽  
pp. 1347-1398
Author(s):  
P. L. Antonelli
Author(s):  
Shahriar Aslani ◽  
Patrick Bernard

Abstract In the study of Hamiltonian systems on cotangent bundles, it is natural to perturb Hamiltonians by adding potentials (functions depending only on the base point). This led to the definition of Mañé genericity [ 8]: a property is generic if, given a Hamiltonian $H$, the set of potentials $g$ such that $H+g$ satisfies the property is generic. This notion is mostly used in the context of Hamiltonians that are convex in $p$, in the sense that $\partial ^2_{pp} H$ is positive definite at each point. We will also restrict our study to this situation. There is a close relation between perturbations of Hamiltonians by a small additive potential and perturbations by a positive factor close to one. Indeed, the Hamiltonians $H+g$ and $H/(1-g)$ have the same level one energy surface, hence their dynamics on this energy surface are reparametrisation of each other, this is the Maupertuis principle. This remark is particularly relevant when $H$ is homogeneous in the fibers (which corresponds to Finsler metrics) or even fiberwise quadratic (which corresponds to Riemannian metrics). In these cases, perturbations by potentials of the Hamiltonian correspond, up to parametrisation, to conformal perturbations of the metric. One of the widely studied aspects is to understand to what extent the return map associated to a periodic orbit can be modified by a small perturbation. This kind of question depends strongly on the context in which they are posed. Some of the most studied contexts are, in increasing order of difficulty, perturbations of general vector fields, perturbations of Hamiltonian systems inside the class of Hamiltonian systems, perturbations of Riemannian metrics inside the class of Riemannian metrics, and Mañé perturbations of convex Hamiltonians. It is for example well known that each vector field can be perturbed to a vector field with only hyperbolic periodic orbits, this is part of the Kupka–Smale Theorem, see [ 5, 13] (the other part of the Kupka–Smale Theorem states that the stable and unstable manifolds intersect transversally; it has also been studied in the various settings mentioned above but will not be discussed here). In the context of Hamiltonian vector fields, the statement has to be weakened, but it remains true that each Hamiltonian can be perturbed to a Hamiltonian with only non-degenerate periodic orbits (including the iterated ones), see [ 11, 12]. The same result is true in the context of Riemannian metrics: every Riemannian metric can be perturbed to a Riemannian metric with only non-degenerate closed geodesics, this is the bumpy metric theorem, see [ 1, 2, 4]. The question was investigated only much more recently in the context of Mañé perturbations of convex Hamiltonians, see [ 9, 10]. It is proved in [ 10] that the same result holds: if $H$ is a convex Hamiltonian and $a$ is a regular value of $H$, then there exist arbitrarily small potentials $g$ such that all periodic orbits (including iterated ones) of $H+g$ at energy $a$ are non-degenerate. The proof given in [ 10] is actually rather similar to the ones given in papers on the perturbations of Riemannian metrics. In all these proofs, it is very useful to work in appropriate coordinates around an orbit segment. In the Riemannian case, one can use the so-called Fermi coordinates. In the Hamiltonian case, appropriate coordinates are considered in [ 10,Lemma 3.1] itself taken from [ 3, Lemma C.1]. However, as we shall detail below, the proof of this Lemma in [ 3], Appendix C, is incomplete, and the statement itself is actually wrong. Our goal in the present paper is to state and prove a corrected version of this normal form Lemma. Our proof is different from the one outlined in [ 3], Appendix C. In particular, it is purely Hamiltonian and does not rest on the results of [ 7] on Finsler metrics, as [ 3] did. Although our normal form is weaker than the one claimed in [ 10], it is actually sufficient to prove the main results of [ 6, 10], as we shall explain after the statement of Theorem 1, and probably also of the other works using [ 3, Lemma C.1].


Author(s):  
V.Sh. Roitenberg ◽  

In this paper, autonomous differential equations of the second order are considered, the right-hand sides of which are polynomials of degree n with respect to the first derivative with periodic continuously differentiable coefficients, and the corresponding vector fields on the cylindrical phase space. The free term and the leading coefficient of the polynomial is assumed not to vanish, which is equivalent to the absence of singular points of the vector field. Rough equations are considered for which the topological structure of the phase portrait does not change under small perturbations in the class of equations under consideration. It is proved that the equation is rough if and only if all its closed trajectories are hyperbolic. Rough equations form an open and everywhere dense set in the space of the equations under consideration. It is shown that for n > 4 an equation of degree n can have arbitrarily many limit cycles. For n = 4, the possible number of limit cycles is determined in the case when the free term and the leading coefficient of the equation have opposite signs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1750080
Author(s):  
Hassan Azad ◽  
Indranil Biswas ◽  
Fazal M. Mahomed

If [Formula: see text] is a semisimple Lie algebra of vector fields on [Formula: see text] with a split Cartan subalgebra [Formula: see text], then it is proved here that the dimension of the generic orbit of [Formula: see text] coincides with the dimension of [Formula: see text]. As a consequence one obtains a local canonical form of [Formula: see text] in terms of exponentials of coordinate functions and vector fields that are independent of these coordinates — for a suitable choice of coordinate system. This result is used to classify semisimple algebras of local vector fields on [Formula: see text] and to determine all representations of [Formula: see text] as local vector fields on [Formula: see text]. These representations are in turn used to find linearizing coordinates for any second-order ordinary differential equation that admits [Formula: see text] as its symmetry algebra and for a system of two second-order ordinary differential equations that admits [Formula: see text] as its symmetry algebra.


2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-163
Author(s):  
B.Zh. Omarova ◽  

The problem of the existence and integral representation of a unique multiperiodic solution of a second-order linear inhomogeneous system with constant coefficients and a differentiation operator on the direction of the main diagonal of the space of time variables and of the vector fields in the form of Lyapunov systems with respect to space variables were considered. The multiperiodicity of zeros of this operator and the condition for the absence of a nonzero multiperiodic and real-analytic solution of the homogeneous system corresponding to the given system are established. An integral representation of solutions of an inhomogeneous linear autonomous system that multiperiodic in time variables and realanalytic in space variables is obtained. The existence theorem of a unique multiperiodic in time variables and real-analytic in space variables solutions of the original linear system in terms of the Green's function under sufficiently general conditions is substantiated.


1952 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 684-698
Author(s):  
S. M. Neamtan ◽  
E. Vogt

A variational principle has been set up for the description of relativistic fields with the aid of Lagrangians involving second order derivatives of the field functions. This constitutes a generalization of the usual formulation in that, besides the boundary conditions usually imposed, it admits also linear homogeneous boundary conditions. The formulation has been developed for the complex scalar and complex vector fields. The variational principle then yields not only the wave equations but also the allowed boundary conditions. A Hamiltonian and equations of motion in canonical form can be set up. A symmetric stress–energy tensor and a charge–current vector are defined, yielding the usual conservation equations. For the vector field, π4 is not identically zero; also the Lorentz condition arises out of the variational principle and does not have to be separately imposed. For the Dirac field an extension to Lagrangians with second order derivatives is not possible, but for this field also the variational principle yields the allowed boundary conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document