Arctic Climate Change: Security Challenges and Stewardship Opportunities

2012 ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth S. Yalowitz
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Arctic Climate ◽  
Security Challenges ◽  
Arctic Climate Change

The Holocene–Anthropocene transition in lakes of western Spitsbergen, Svalbard (Norwegian High Arctic): climate change and nitrogen deposition

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia U. Holmgren ◽  
Christian Bigler ◽  
Ólafur Ingólfsson ◽  
Alexander P. Wolfe
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Nitrogen Deposition ◽  
High Arctic ◽  
Arctic Climate ◽  
The Holocene ◽  
Arctic Climate Change

Modelling Arctic climate change

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
H. Cattle ◽  
J. Crossley
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Arctic Climate ◽  
Arctic Climate Change

scholarly journals Arctic climate change and pollution impact little auk foraging and fitness across a decade

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Françoise Amélineau ◽  
David Grémillet ◽  
Ann M. A. Harding ◽  
Wojciech Walkusz ◽  
Rémi Choquet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Arctic Climate ◽  
Little Auk ◽  
Pollution Impact ◽  
Arctic Climate Change

scholarly journals An integrated index of recent pan-Arctic climate change

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 035006 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E Overland ◽  
Muyin Wang ◽  
Jason E Box
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Arctic Climate ◽  
Integrated Index ◽  
Arctic Climate Change

scholarly journals Actors and justifications in media debates on Arctic climate change in Finland and Canada: A network approach

2020 ◽  
pp. 000169931989090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Kukkonen ◽  
Mark CJ Stoddart ◽  
Tuomas Ylä-Anttila
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Arctic Climate ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Network Approach ◽  
Policy Actors ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Media ◽  
Arctic Climate Change ◽  
Moral Justifications

In this paper, we examine the centrality of policy actors and moral justifications in media debates on Arctic climate change in Finland and Canada from 2011–2015. We take a network approach on the media debates by analysing relations between the actors and justifications, using discourse network analysis on a dataset of 745 statements from four newspapers. We find that in both countries, governments and universities are the most central actors, whereas business actors are the least central. Justifications that value environmental sustainability and scientific knowledge are most central and used across actor types. However, ecological justifications are sometimes in conflict with market justifications. Government actors emphasize new economic possibilities in the Arctic whereas environmental organizations demand greater protection of the vulnerable Arctic. Ecological justifications and justifications that value international cooperation are more central in the Finnish debate, whereas justifications valuing sustainability and science, as well as those valuing national sovereignty, are more central in the Canadian debate. We conclude that in addition to the centrality of specific policy actors in media debates, the use of different types of moral justifications also reflects political power in the media sphere.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document