Bringing Climate Change Science to the Landscape Level: Canadian Experience in Using Landscape Visualisation Within Participatory Processes for Community Planning

Author(s):  
Stephen R. J. Sheppard ◽  
Alison Shaw ◽  
David Flanders ◽  
Sarah Burch ◽  
Olaf Schroth
2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 681-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia M. Jones

Abstract The importance of estuarine seagrass beds as nurseries for juvenile fish has become a universal paradigm, especially for estuaries that are as important as the Chesapeake Bay. Yet, scientific tests of this hypothesis were equivocal depending on species, location, and metrics. Moreover, seagrasses themselves are under threat and one-third of seagrasses have disappeared worldwide with 65% of their losses occurring in estuaries. Although there have been extensive studies of seagrasses in the Chesapeake Bay, surprisingly few studies have quantified the relationship between seagrass as nurseries for finfish in the Bay. Of the few studies that have directly evaluated the use of seagrass nurseries, most have concentrated on single species or were of short duration. Few landscape-level or long-term studies have examined this relationship in the Bay or explored the potential effect of climate change. This review paper summarizes the seagrass habitat value as nurseries and presents recent juvenile fish studies that address the dearth of research at the long term and landscape level with an emphasis on the Chesapeake Bay. An important conclusion upon the review of these studies is that predicting the effects of climate change on fishery production remains uncertain.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Gietel-Basten

Population ageing is presented as one of the ‘grand challenges’ of the twenty-first century. Yet, policies designed to offset these challenges seem to be a jumbled, disjointed mix with no clear, overarching narrative. One of the successes of climate change science is the development of a clear, distinguishable framework to plan action: adaptation, mitigation, and resilience. This framework can be applied to designing better policy for ageing: adapting to support people in need today; mitigating future challenges by ensuring that people and institutions ‘age better’; and building resilience by developing both a longer-term perspective and policy learning framework.


2007 ◽  
Vol 87 (S1) ◽  
pp. 7-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Franco ◽  
Dan Cayan ◽  
Amy Luers ◽  
Michael Hanemann ◽  
Bart Croes

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin D. Santer ◽  
Céline J. W. Bonfils ◽  
Qiang Fu ◽  
John C. Fyfe ◽  
Gabriele C. Hegerl ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document