landscape level
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

735
(FIVE YEARS 162)

H-INDEX

56
(FIVE YEARS 8)

2022 ◽  
pp. 495-508
Author(s):  
Ang Phuri Sherpa ◽  
Sonam Tashi Lama ◽  
Saroj Shrestha ◽  
Brian Williams ◽  
Damber Bista

Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Ana Martins ◽  
Ana Novais ◽  
José Lima Santos ◽  
Maria João Canadas

Forest management at the landscape level is a requirement for reducing wildfire hazard. In contexts where non-industrial private forest ownership prevails, the collaboration among multiple owners has been proposed as the way forward to reach consistent fuel management at that level. The current literature has been focused on identifying the factors that lead to collaboration among owners. In this study we explored other ways to reach landscape-level management in addition to the collaborative way, such as those that may be promoted through land renting or selling. Different contexts and owner types may require different solutions. Thus, we explicitly asked which alternative would be chosen by a given forest owner, from the following set: keeping individual management, entering a multi-owner collaborative arrangement where they delegate management, renting to a pulp company; or selling the land. In a context of small-scale ownership and high recurrence of wildfires in Portugal, a face-to-face survey was carried out to a sample of landowners. Our results suggest that there is not an a priori generalized unwillingness of owners to delegate management, rent or sell the land and thus they seem prone to align themselves with policy strategies to promote management at the landscape level. Multinomial logit regression modelling allowed us to explain and predict owners’ choices among the aforementioned set of alternative management options. We found that choosing multi-ownership collaboration, as opposed to keeping current individual management, is associated with passive management under harsher conditions, by non-residents without bonding capital. The identified factors of owners’ choices show the limited scope of tenancy and land-market mechanisms to promote landscape-level management. The best policy option was found to depend on the owner profiles prevailing in the target area. This suggests that studying the existing context and owner types is required to design effective policies.


Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1810
Author(s):  
Reimo Lutter ◽  
Gustav Stål ◽  
Lina Arnesson Ceder ◽  
Hyungwoo Lim ◽  
Allar Padari ◽  
...  

The new European Union Forest Strategy for 2030 aims to plant an additional 3 billion trees on non-forest land to mitigate climate change. However, the choice of tree species for afforestation to achieve the maximum climate benefit is unclear. We compared the climate benefit of six different species in terms of carbon (C) sequestration in biomass and the harvested wood substitution in products to avoid carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil-based materials over the 100-year period by afforesting about ¼ of the available area in northern Europe. The highest climate benefit was observed for larch, both at a stand scale (1626 Mg CO2 eqv. ha−1) and at the landscape level for the studied scenario (579 million Mg CO2 eqv.). Larch was followed by Norway spruce, poplar, hybrid aspen and birch, showing a climate benefit about 40–50% lower than that for larch. The climate benefit of willow was about 70% lower than larch. Willow showed 6–14-fold lower C stocks at the landscape level after 100 years than other tree species. The major climate benefit over the 100-year period comes from wood substitution and avoided emissions, but C stock buildup at the landscape level also removes significant amounts of CO2 already present in the atmosphere. The choice of tree species is important to maximize climate change mitigation.


Author(s):  
Sarah T. Lovell ◽  
Gary Bentrup ◽  
Erik Stanek
Keyword(s):  

AMBIO ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natividad Aguilera-Alcalá ◽  
Eneko Arrondo ◽  
Roberto Pascual-Rico ◽  
Zebensui Morales-Reyes ◽  
José M. Gil-Sánchez ◽  
...  

AbstractIn recent decades, intensive techniques of livestock raising have flourished, which has largely replaced traditional farming practices such as transhumance. These changes may have affected scavengers’ behaviour and ecology, as extensive livestock is a key source of carrion. This study evaluates the spatial responses of avian scavengers to the seasonal movements of transhumant herds in south-eastern Spain. We surveyed the abundance of avian scavengers and ungulates, and analysed the factors affecting the space use by 30 GPS-tracked griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus). Griffons’ foraging activity increased in the pasturelands occupied by transhumant herds, which implied greater vulture abundance at the landscape level during the livestock season. In contrast, facultative scavengers were more abundant without transhumant livestock herds, and the abundance of wild ungulates did not change in relation to livestock presence. We conclude that fostering transhumance and other traditional farming systems, to the detriment of farming intensification, could favour vulture conservation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiayong Gao ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Maolin He ◽  
Pingping Yang ◽  
Jun Jing

Abstract Soil erosion is a process of migration and redistribution of soil substances in the landscape, which is regulated by topography, vegetation, human activities and their spatial pattern. At the watershed scale, changes in landscape pattern are important factors in determining the degree of soil erosion. Taking Dabang River Basin as the study area, based on the three phases of land use data, remote sensing image data and daily rainfall data from eight stations in the basin in 2010, 2015 and 2020, the rocky desertification factor (D) was introduced into the general soil loss equation RUSLE to calculate the soil erosion in Karst and non-Karst Areas in 2010, 2015 and 2020 respectively. The relationship between landscape pattern and soil erosion was analyzed from two aspects: type level index and landscape level index. The results showed that: 1) From 2010 to 2020, the average soil erosion modulus in The Dabang River Basin decreased first and then increased. The average soil erosion modulus in the non-karst region was about twice that in the karst region, and the average soil erosion modulus in the karst region decreased first and then increased. The mean soil erosion modulus in the non-karst area showed an increasing trend; 2) Under different slope grades, the erosion was mainly slight and mild, and the area of slight erosion was the largest, and the area of very strong and severe erosion increased as the slope increased. the area of strong, very strong and severe erosion increased in the slope zone below 15°, the area of light and moderate erosion decreased, and the area of slight, strong and very strong erosion increased in the slope zone from 15 to 25°, and the area of slight erosion increased in the slope zone above 25° area increased and light, moderate and strong erosion area decreased in the slope zone above 25°; 3) The landscape pattern of the Dadang River Basin changed significantly from 2010 to 2020. At the landscape level, the number of patches increased and the average patch area decreased. At the type level, the area of paddy field, woodland and shrubland decreases and the area of dry land, grassland, construction land and water body increased, and the dominant land type in the watershed changed from woodland to grassland; 4) The amount of soil erosion was positively correlated with patch type area, landscape percentage, maximum patch index and aggregation index, and positively correlated with edge density; 5) There was a linear relationship between soil erosion and Shannon diversity index (SHDI) and Shannon mean index (SHEI) at landscape level. The results can provide reference for land use planning and soil and water conservation measures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document