Florida’s Voluntary Universal Prekindergarten: A Citizen’s Initiative Meets Political and Policy Realities

Author(s):  
Lynn Hartle ◽  
Alisa S. Ghazvini
Author(s):  
W. Steven Barnett ◽  
Kirsty C. Brown ◽  
Matia Finn-Stevenson ◽  
Christopher Henrich

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary T. Henry ◽  
Craig S. Gordon ◽  
Dana K. Rickman

The debates over the 2003 reauthorization of Head Start highlighted a controversy about the devolution of federal early education policy. At the center of the debate is the concern that state control of early education programs will reduce the quality and effectiveness of federal support for children living in poverty, and their families. The current fragmentation of early education policy, with both federal Head Start programs and state-subsidized prekindergarten programs operating in close proximity, presents an opportunity to compare the programs’ quality and effectiveness within a region of common support. In this study, propensity score techniques were used to match a probability sample of Head Start participants in Georgia with a group of children who were eligible for Head Start but who attended the state prekindergarten program in Georgia. The two groups were statistically similar at the beginning of their preschool year on three of four direct assessments (p < .05), but by the beginning of kindergarten the children attending the state prekindergarten program posted higher developmental outcomes on five of six direct assessments (p < .05) and 14 of 17 ratings by kindergarten teachers (p < .05). This study indicates that economically disadvantaged children who attended Georgia’s universal prekindergarten entered kindergarten at least as well prepared as similar children who attended the Head Start program.


AERA Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 233285841984844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Shapiro ◽  
Eleanor Martin ◽  
Christina Weiland ◽  
Rebecca Unterman

Universal public prekindergarten programs have been expanding in recent years, but not all eligible families apply to these programs, for reasons that are not well understood. Using two cohorts of students ( N = 8,391) enrolled in Boston Public Schools, we use geographic information systems to combine administrative records with census data to compare the student-, neighborhood-, and school-level characteristics of kindergarteners who did and did not apply to the Boston Public Schools prekindergarten program. We find that nonappliers are more likely to be non-White ( SD = 0.27), low income ( SD = 0.11), and dual language ( SD = 0.58), particularly those who did not attend any other prekindergarten program. We find similar differences at the neighborhood and school levels. Our study provides some of the first descriptive information on the sociodemographic characteristics and spatial distribution of families who opt out of applying to universal prekindergarten programs. Findings may inform recruitment strategies to promote equitable and universal prekindergarten enrollment.


Author(s):  
Edward Zigler ◽  
Walter S. Gilliam ◽  
Stephanie M. Jones

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-274
Author(s):  
Ying Lu ◽  
Sharon L. Weinberg ◽  
Meghan McCormick

Using proprietary data collected prior to the establishment of the public Universal Prekindergarten program in New York City, this study finds statistically significant differences in test-taking rates for the city’s Gifted & Talented (G & T) program between two matched samples of students—those who attended a public prekindergarten (pre-K) program and those who did not—for each of four cohorts from 2008 to 2011, favoring the public pre-K group. Results also demonstrate that access to information about the G & T program is a plausible mechanism underlying the higher test-taking rates among the public pre-K group, especially for underrepresented groups. With the establishment of the Universal Prekindergarten in New York City in 2015, our results highlight the importance of instituting new policies for promoting the dissemination of information regarding the G & T admissions process within the public school sector. If targeted to address diversity in G & T, such policies could help reduce inequality in gifted education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document