Atmospheric Waves

Author(s):  
M. W. Moncrieff
Keyword(s):  
Tellus ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 499-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. P. Kurbatkin
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.B Jones ◽  
D.M. Wright ◽  
J. Milner ◽  
T.K. Yeoman ◽  
T. Reid ◽  
...  

In previous communications we have outlined two experimental methods of examining the effects of the atmospheric ionized layer in short-distance wireless transmission. In the first type of experiment the existence of night-time interference phenomena between two sets of waves was demonstrated by changing the wave-length of the transmitter continuously through a small range and observing the resultant maxima and minima of signal intensity. It was suggested that such interference took place between ground waves and waves deviated through large angles by the upper atmosphere. In the second type of experiment the angle of incidence of such atmospheric waves at the earth’s surface was measured by comparing the magnitude of the electric and magnetic forces in the stationary wave system produced at the ground. The results of these experiments were interpreted as yielding a direct experimental proof of the existence of the Kennelly-Heaviside layer, and also as demonstrating that the “fading” of broadcasting signals at moderate distances from the transmitter was due mainly to interference phenomena between two sets of waves arriving at a receiver with an appreciable path difference. But there still remained the problem of the cause of the natural succession of interference effects which constitutes fading at moderate distances, and which takes place continuously throughout the night-time. These variations indicate either that the phase relation between the ground and atmospheric waves is continually changing at night, or that intensity or polarization changes of the atmospheric waves are taking place. In considering possible causes of phase variations, let us examine the relation between the path difference and the wave-length for a typical case of short-distance transmission. Let D represent the path-difference between the ground and atmospheric rays. Then the atmospheric ray arrives n wavelengths behind the ground ray at the receiver, where n = D/ λ , and λ is the wave-length. It has been mentioned above that a possible cause of the natural signal variations which occur at night is a continuous change of phase which would be produced by a change in n . Such a change might be brought about by changes in D, or in λ , or in both simultaneously, and it is necessary to decide between these possibilities. Changes in D might be brought about by a variation in the height of the layer, so that a Döppler effect at "reflection” is produced. In such a case the signal variation might be regarded as the beating between the ground-ray frequency and the reflected-ray frequency. On the other hand, if there is a slow variation of transmitter frequency, the frequency of the atmospheric ray would be different from that of the ground ray, because of the difference in times of emission from the transmitter, and, again, the natural changes might be regarded as beats. The suggestion has already been made by Breit that fading is due to the modulation of the carrier wave, and thus to change of wave-length. In the latter connection we have to consider the variation of both carrier wave and side-band frequencies. The results of our earlier experiments suggested that the change of side-band frequency necessary for the wireless transmission of music is sufficient to produce selective frequency fading, and thus a certain amount of distortion. But with the normal type of modulation the signal intensity is chiefly dependent on the intensity of the carrier wave, and the question whether a slow “swing” of the carrier wave is responsible for such fading (which is observed whether the carrier wave is modulated or unmodulated) seems still unanswered. The question, of course, is equally of interest in both continuous wave telegraphy and wireless telephony.


2020 ◽  
pp. 197-217
Author(s):  
Vlado Spiridonov ◽  
Mladjen Curic
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Petra Koucká Knížová ◽  
Jan Laštovička ◽  
Daniel Kouba ◽  
Zbyšek Mošna ◽  
Katerina Podolská ◽  
...  

The ionosphere represents part of the upper atmosphere. Its variability is observed on a wide-scale temporal range from minutes, or even shorter, up to scales of the solar cycle and secular variations of solar energy input. Ionosphere behavior is predominantly determined by solar and geomagnetic forcing. However, the lower-lying atmospheric regions can contribute significantly to the resulting energy budget. The energy transfer between distant atmospheric parts happens due to atmospheric waves that propagate from their source region up to ionospheric heights. Experimental observations show the importance of the involvement of the lower atmosphere in ionospheric variability studies in order to accurately capture small-scale features of the upper atmosphere. In the Part I Coupling, we provide a brief overview of the influence of the lower atmosphere on the ionosphere and summarize the current knowledge. In the Part II Coupling Evidences Within Ionospheric Plasma—Experiments in Midlatitudes, we demonstrate experimental evidence from mid-latitudes, particularly those based on observations by instruments operated by the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences. The focus will mainly be on coupling by atmospheric waves.


2019 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 60-74
Author(s):  
M. Devi ◽  
A.K. Barbara ◽  
S. Patgiri ◽  
A. Depueva ◽  
A. Medhi ◽  
...  

Eos ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 92 (46) ◽  
pp. 420-420
Author(s):  
Colin Schultz
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Vol 51 (1A) ◽  
pp. 147-147
Author(s):  
W. H. Hooke ◽  
J. M. Young ◽  
D. W. Beran

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jadranka Sepic ◽  
Mira Pasaric ◽  
Iva Medugorac ◽  
Ivica Vilibic ◽  
Maja Karlovic ◽  
...  

<p>The northern and the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea are occasionally affected by extreme sea-levels known to cause substantial material damage. These extremes appear due to the superposition of several ocean processes that occur at different periods, have different spatial extents, and are caused by distinct forcing mechanisms.</p><p>To better understand the extremes, hourly sea-level time series from six tide-gauge stations located along the northern and the eastern Adriatic coast (Venice, Trieste, Rovinj, Bakar, Split, Dubrovnik) were collected for the period of 1956 to 2015 (1984 to 2015 for Venice) and analysed. The time series have been checked for spurious data, and then decomposed using tidal analysis and filtering procedures. The following time series were thus obtained for each station: (1) trend; (2) seasonal signal; (3) tides; (4-7) sea-level oscillations at periods: (4) longer than 100 days, (5) from 10 to 100 days, (6) from 6 hours to 10 days, and (7) shorter than 6 hours. These bands correspond, respectively, to sea-level fluctuations dominantly forced by (but not restricted to): (1) climate change and land uplift and sinking; (2) seasonal changes; (3) tidal forcing; (4); quasi-stationary atmospheric and ocean circulation and climate variability patterns; (5) planetary atmospheric waves; (6) synoptic atmospheric processes; and (7) mesoscale atmospheric processes.</p><p>Positive sea-level extremes surpassing 99.95 and 99.99 percentile values, and negative sea-level extremes lower than 0.05 and 0.01 percentile values were extracted from the original time series for each station. It was shown that positive (negative) extremes are up to 50-100% higher (lower) in the northern than in the south-eastern Adriatic. Then, station-based distributions, return periods, seasonal distributions, event durations, and trends were estimated and assessed. It was shown that the northern Adriatic positive sea-level extremes are dominantly caused by synoptic atmospheric processes superimposed to positive tide (contributing jointly to ~70% of total extreme height), whereas more to the south-east, positive extremes are caused by planetary atmospheric waves, synoptic atmospheric processes, and tides (each contributing with an average of ~25%). As for the negative sea-level extremes, these are due to a combination of planetary atmospheric waves and tides: in the northern Adriatic tide provides the largest contribution (~60%) while in the south-eastern Adriatic the two processes are of similar impact (each contributing with an average of ~30%). The simultaneity of the events along the entire northern and eastern Adriatic coast was studied as well, revealing that positive extremes are strongly regional dependant, i.e. that they usually appear simultaneously only along one part of the coast, whereas negative extremes are more likely to appear along the entire coast at the same time.</p><p>Finally, it is suggested that the distribution of sea-level extremes along the south-eastern Adriatic coast can be explained as a superposition of tidal forcing and prevailing atmospheric processes, whereas for the northern Adriatic, strong topographic enhancement of sea-level extremes is also important.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document