Case Study: the Use of Field Screening Methods with the Sensor Technique

1995 ◽  
pp. 463-472
Author(s):  
Christine Eberle
Keyword(s):  
Screening Methods ◽  
Field Screening ◽  
Sensor Technique

A field screening test for the assessment of concentrations and mobility of potentially toxic elements in soils: a case study on urban soils from Rome and Novi Sad

2017 ◽  
Vol 189 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Rita Montereali ◽  
Valentina Pinto ◽  
Francesca Schiavella ◽  
Giovanna Armiento ◽  
Massimo Angelone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screening Test ◽  
Urban Soils ◽  
Toxic Elements ◽  
Potentially Toxic Elements ◽  
Field Screening ◽  
Novi Sad

scholarly journals Resiliensi pada Remaja Tunadaksa yang Mengalami Bullying

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Melinda Oviyanti ◽  
Wiwin Hendriani
Keyword(s):  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Female Adolescent ◽  
The Other ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Resilience Theory ◽  
Purposive Sampling

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran resiliensi yang ditinjau dari teori Grotberg. Sumber resiliensi, sebagaimana dinyatakan oleh Grotberg, dibagi menjadi 3 dimana terdapat sumber I am, I have, dan I can. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan tipe penelitian studi kasus intrinsik. Pemilihan partisipan menggunakan purposive sampling dengan metode screening resilience. Partisipan berjumlah 3 remaja perempuan yang terdiri dari seorang remaja berusia 14 tahun dan 2 remaja berusia 15 tahun. Proses pengambilan data menggunakan wawancara dan dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik theory-driven. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ketiga partisipan memiliki bentuk coping stress yang berbeda untuk menuju resiliensi. Partisipan 3 memiliki resiliensi paling menonjol di antara partisipan lain, dan meskipun terdapat banyak adversity yang dialami, partisipan 3 menunjukkan resiliensi yang tinggi melalui indikator I am. This study aimed to overview the Grotberg's resilience theory. The source of resilience, as stated by Grotberg, is divided into 3 which include "I am", "I have", and "I can". This was qualitative intrinsic case study. The participants were chosen by purposive sampling with resilience screening methods. There were 3 female adolescent participants; one aged 14 years old and the other two aged 15 years old. The data were collected using interviews and analyzed using theory-driven thematic analysis. The result of this study indicated that the participants had different forms of coping stress towards resilience. Participant 3 was the most prominent among other participants, and although participant 3 experienced adversity, the participant demonstrated a high resilience as evidenced through the "I am" indicator.

MABOWEG — A Mobile Force Using Field Screening Methods

1997 ◽  
pp. 279-282
Author(s):  
Frieder Kern ◽  
Werner Eitel ◽  
Arno Maurer
Keyword(s):  
Screening Methods ◽  
Field Screening

Evaluation of Two Field Screening Test Kits for the Detection of PCBs in Soil by Immunoassay

1994 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 1664-1671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry C Waters ◽  
Rob R Smith ◽  
Joe H Stewart ◽  
Roger A Jenkins ◽  
Richard W Counts
Keyword(s):  
False Negative ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Effective Field ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Laboratory Methods ◽  
Rigorous Evaluation ◽  
Field Screening ◽  
Hazardous Waste Sites ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Antigen Antibody

Abstract Effective field screening methods could minimize the time and reduce the cost of characterizing and remediating hazardous waste sites. Rigorous evaluation of novel field screening methods is required before they can be considered as replacements for, or adjuncts to, currently used laboratory methods. Alternatives to standard laboratory analytical methods should be rapid, analyte-specific, cost-effective, accurate, and sensitive in the range at which the analyte is regulated. In this study, 2 immunoassay- based field test kits for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in soil were evaluated with reference to those criteria. PCBs were analyzed in both spiked and field soil samples. Based on laboratory performance, we estimate that 20 to 40 samples can be analyzed in the field per day. Sensitivity of the assay is in the 1 ppm range. Because the assay is based on the specificity of the antigen/antibody reaction, interferences are practically negligible. The method is accurate; the false-negative and false-positive results that were observed can be explained by differences in the immunoreactivities of the Aroclors present in the test samples and the Aroclors used as standards in the assay. The savings in time and expense to analyze PCBs in soil with the immunoassay-based test kits over conventional laboratory methods should be substantial.

Validation of screening methods according to Regulation 519/2014/EU. Determination of deoxynivalenol in wheat by lateral flow immunoassay: A case study

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 137-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica M.T. Lattanzio ◽  
Biancamaria Ciasca ◽  
Stephen Powers ◽  
Christoph von Holst
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Lateral Flow Immunoassay ◽  
Screening Methods
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document