Historical Land Use Changes: Sweden

Author(s):  
S. Anderberg
2020 ◽  
Vol 530 ◽  
pp. 115946 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Feinberg ◽  
I. Lascu ◽  
E.A. Lima ◽  
B.P. Weiss ◽  
J.A. Dorale ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1105-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melannie D. Hartman ◽  
Emily R. Merchant ◽  
William J. Parton ◽  
Myron P. Gutmann ◽  
Susan M. Lutz ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Yang ◽  
Shuwen Zhang ◽  
Yansui Liu ◽  
Xiaoshi Xing ◽  
Alex de Sherbinin

Abstract Historical land use information is essential to understanding the impact of anthropogenic modification of land use/cover on the temporal dynamics of environmental and ecological issues. However, due to a lack of spatial explicitness, complete thematic details and the conversion types for historical land use changes, the majority of historical land use reconstructions do not sufficiently meet the requirements for an adequate model. Considering these shortcomings, we explored the possibility of constructing a spatially-explicit modeling framework (HLURM: Historical Land Use Reconstruction Model). Then a three-map comparison method was adopted to validate the projected reconstruction map. The reconstruction suggested that the HLURM model performed well in the spatial reconstruction of various land-use categories, and had a higher figure of merit (48.19%) than models used in other case studies. The largest land use/cover type in the study area was determined to be grassland, followed by arable land and wetland. Using the three-map comparison, we noticed that the major discrepancies in land use changes among the three maps were as a result of inconsistencies in the classification of land-use categories during the study period, rather than as a result of the simulation model.


AMBIO ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mats Sandewall ◽  
Bo Ohlsson ◽  
Silavanh Sawathvong

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
María V. Jiménez-Franco ◽  
Eva Graciá ◽  
Roberto C. Rodríguez-Caro ◽  
José D. Anadón ◽  
Thorsten Wiegand ◽  
...  

Abstract Context Land-use change is one of the main threats to biodiversity on the global scale. Legacy effects of historical land-use changes may affect population dynamics of long-lived species, but they are difficult to evaluate through observational studies alone. We present here an interdisciplinary modelling approach as an alternative to address this problem in landscape ecology. Objectives Assess effects of agricultural abandonment and anthropisation on the population dynamics of long-lived species. Specifically, we evaluated: (a) how changes in movement patterns caused by land-use change might impact population dynamics; (b) time-lag responses of demographic variables in relation to land-use changes. Methods We applied an individual-based and spatial-explicit simulation model of the spur-tighed tortoise (Testudo graeca), an endangered species, to sequences of real-world landscape changes representing agricultural abandonment and anthropisation at the local scale. We analysed different demographic variables and compared an “impact scenario” (i.e., historical land-use changes) with a “control scenario” (no land-use changes). Results While agricultural abandonment did not lead to relevant changes in demographic variables, anthropisation negatively affected the reproductive rate, population density and the extinction probability with time-lag responses of 20, 30 and 130 years, respectively, and caused an extinction debt of 22%. Conclusions We provide an understanding of how changes in animal movement driven by land-use changes can translate into lagged impacts on demography and, ultimately, on population viability. Implementation of proactive mitigation management are needed to promote landscape connectivity, especially for long-lived species for which first signatures of an extinction debt may arise only after decades.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document