Non-invasive Pulse Wave Velocity as a Method to Evaluate Physical Properties of the Large Arteries in Aging and Hypertension

Author(s):  
José L. Palma-Gámiz
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
P. Nikolov

The PURPUSE of the present study is changes in function and structure of large arteries in individuals with High Normal Arterial Pressure (HNAP) to be established. MATERIAL and METHODS: Structural and functional changes in the large arteries were investigated in 80 individuals with HNAP and in 45 with optimal arterial pressure (OAP). In terms of arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AI), central aortic pressure (CAP), pulse pressure (PP) were followed up in HNAP group. Intima media thickness (IMT), flow-induced vasodilatation (FMD), ankle-brachial index (ABI) were also studied. RESULTS: Significantly increased values of pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, central aortic pressure, pulse pressure are reported in the HNAP group. In terms of IMT and ABI, being in the reference interval, there is no significant difference between HNAP and OAP groups. The calculated cardiovascular risk (CVR) in both groups is low. CONCLUSION: Significantly higher values of pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, central aortic pressure and pulse pressure in the HNAP group are reported.


1952 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-129
Author(s):  
J. P. Adamson ◽  
J. Doupe

Intra-arterial pressures and pulse wave velocities were measured in 18 subjects whose auscultatory diastolic pressures ranged from 45 to 120 mm. Hg. Various methods were used to lower the blood pressure in the hypertensive and to raise it in nonhypertensive subjects so that pulse wave velocities might be compared in all subjects at a common diastolic pressure. The pulse wave velocities were calculated for a diastolic pressure of 80 mm. Hg. No significant differences were found between hypertensive and nonhypertensive subjects. It was concluded that a defect of arterial elasticity as gauged by pulse wave velocity is not a factor in the pathogenesis of hypertension.


2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian B. Wilkinson ◽  
Carmel M. McEniery ◽  
Giuseppe Schillaci ◽  
Pierre Boutouyrie ◽  
Patrick Segers ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1507-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng-Qiu Zhu ◽  
Ling-Shan Chen ◽  
Han Wang ◽  
Fu-Ming Liu ◽  
Yun Luan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. e224
Author(s):  
C. Magistri ◽  
F.U.S. Mattace Raso ◽  
F. Battista ◽  
F. Anastasio ◽  
G. Pucci

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L McLeod ◽  
Neal G Uren ◽  
Ian B Wilkinson ◽  
David J Webb ◽  
Simon RJ Maxwell ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 433-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah GLADDISH ◽  
Dulka MANAWADU ◽  
Winston BANYA ◽  
James CAMERON ◽  
Christopher J. BULPITT ◽  
...  

In the present study, the repeatability of three techniques for measuring peripheral PWV (pulse wave velocity) has been studied. A transcranial Doppler provided a wave reading from the middle cerebral artery. Using the transit time between the R-wave of an ECG and the ‘foot’ of this wave we were able to calculate a PWV (PWV-brain). An ear clip transducer provided a pressure wave reading (PWV-ear). A third pressure reading came from a Finapres transducer on the left middle finger (PWV-finger). The PWV was calculated as distance between two points/transit time of the pulse wave. Eleven volunteers had three sets of readings averaged for each technique taken in two separate sessions. There was good agreement between observers for the mean PWV values, and good agreement for mean results in different sessions. The RC%s (repeatability coefficient percentages) for between-observer repeatability in each session were good and approximately equivalent for PWV-finger (5–7%) and PWV-brain (5–7%). The repeatability of the PWV-ear measurement was less satisfactory (8–18%). The RC% for the same observer between sessions was less good, being 11% for the PWV-finger, 16–17% for PWV-brain and 11–19% for PWV-ear. The RC%s for the inter-session inter-observer measurements were between 10.7–12.1% for the PWV-finger, 14.7–19.5% for PWV-brain and 8.3–15% for PWV-ear. The transit time RC%s were lower in most measurements. The between-observer repeatability of all measures was satisfactory. Owing to the less good repeatability on different occasions, the use of PWV-brain and PWV-ear will depend on the magnitude of differences to be expected.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (Suppl. 2) ◽  
pp. S331
Author(s):  
S. Gladdish ◽  
D. Manawadu ◽  
W. Banya ◽  
J. D. Cameron ◽  
C. Bulpitt ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. e155-e156
Author(s):  
A. Grillo ◽  
F. Scalise ◽  
F. Moretti ◽  
M. Rovina ◽  
L. Salvi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. e477
Author(s):  
E. Tartagni ◽  
G. Simon ◽  
N. Sloboda ◽  
C. Labat ◽  
C. Borghi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document