scholarly journals Inter-disciplinary Analysis of Climate Change and Society: A Network Approach

Author(s):  
Jeffrey Broadbent ◽  
Philip Vaughter
2020 ◽  
pp. 000169931989090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Kukkonen ◽  
Mark CJ Stoddart ◽  
Tuomas Ylä-Anttila

In this paper, we examine the centrality of policy actors and moral justifications in media debates on Arctic climate change in Finland and Canada from 2011–2015. We take a network approach on the media debates by analysing relations between the actors and justifications, using discourse network analysis on a dataset of 745 statements from four newspapers. We find that in both countries, governments and universities are the most central actors, whereas business actors are the least central. Justifications that value environmental sustainability and scientific knowledge are most central and used across actor types. However, ecological justifications are sometimes in conflict with market justifications. Government actors emphasize new economic possibilities in the Arctic whereas environmental organizations demand greater protection of the vulnerable Arctic. Ecological justifications and justifications that value international cooperation are more central in the Finnish debate, whereas justifications valuing sustainability and science, as well as those valuing national sovereignty, are more central in the Canadian debate. We conclude that in addition to the centrality of specific policy actors in media debates, the use of different types of moral justifications also reflects political power in the media sphere.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 104019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan S Debortoli ◽  
Jesse S Sayles ◽  
Dylan G Clark ◽  
James D Ford

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 146-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Calliari ◽  
Melania Michetti ◽  
Luca Farnia ◽  
Emiliano Ramieri

Botany ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (7) ◽  
pp. 525-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Elle ◽  
Sherri L. Elwell ◽  
Grahame A. Gielens

Recent concern about declines in pollinating insects highlights the need for better understanding of plant–pollinator interactions. One promising approach at the community scale is network analysis, which allows actual interactions to be assessed, unlike biodiversity surveys, which only identify the potentially interacting organisms. We highlight useful network properties for conservation research and examples of their use in the study of rare species, invasive species, responses of communities to climate change, and habitat loss and restoration. We suggest that nestedness, degree, and interaction strength asymmetry are the most useful network properties for applied research on plant–pollinator interactions, but also highlight practical concerns regarding their measurement. We encourage the adoption of a network approach when an understanding of function within communities, rather than simple community composition, is useful for management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document