Mycorrhizal Assisted Phytoremediation of Xenobiotics from Contaminated Soil

Author(s):  
Awadhesh Kumar Shukla ◽  
Amit Kishore Singh ◽  
Anjney Sharma
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 964-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Asilian ◽  
Reza Ghasemi-Fasaei ◽  
Abdolmajid Ronaghi ◽  
Mozhgan Sepehri ◽  
Ali Niazi

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-333
Author(s):  
Kongkeat Jampasri ◽  
Prayad Pokethitiyook ◽  
Toemthip Poolpak ◽  
Maleeya Kruatrachue ◽  
Puey Ounjai ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. 316-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meri Barbafieri ◽  
Francesca Pedron ◽  
Gianniantonio Petruzzelli ◽  
Irene Rosellini ◽  
Elisabetta Franchi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 1010-1012 ◽  
pp. 564-569
Author(s):  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Qiang Chen ◽  
Hong Bing Luo ◽  
Xiao Ting Li

An earthworm-assisted phytoremediation of Cr contaminated soil was conducted to study the performance of different earthworm species in Cr accumulation of Vetiver Grass (vetiveria Zizanioides VG). Two species of earthworm (Eisenia Foelide and Pheretima guillemi Michaelsen) were added in trial. The result showed Vetiveria Zizanioides can absorb great amounts of chromium in soil. The decline rate of Cr was up to 87% and 78% respectively in the tiral of Eisenia Foelide (EF) and Pheretima guillemi Michaelsen(PGM) at 60th day. As the concentration of Cr gradually increased within 3.3-120mg/kg, the accumulation activity of two groups presented first increase and then decrease and reached maximum 976.7mg/kg and 943.1 mg/kg in root. It began to decrease when the Cr concentration was above 120mg/kg.Vetiveria Zizanioides's accumulation ability differs in root and shoot. It presented root>shoot. With a comparative analysis, PGM has higher accumulation and resistance to Cr at any designed treatments. In the analysis of relation between plants and soils, it was found that there was significant correlation in Cr contents between plants and soils (P<0.05). There was a high retention rate of Vetiveria Zizanioides root to Cr. Retention rate of any treatments adding earthworm were all greater than 87.91%. The biggest value was up to 96.23%. There was no obvious difference between EG and PGM in retention rate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document