New Fuzzy Divergence Measures, Series, Its Bounds and Applications in Strategic Decision-Making

2019 ◽  
pp. 641-653
Author(s):  
Ram Naresh Saraswat ◽  
Neha Khatod
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Strategic Decision ◽  
Strategic Decision Making ◽  
Divergence Measures ◽  
Fuzzy Divergence

scholarly journals An Exponential Jensen Fuzzy Divergence Measure with Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Joshi ◽  
Satish Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Multiple Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Strategic Decision ◽  
Strategic Decision Making ◽  
Jensen Inequality ◽  
Divergence Measure ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Fuzzy Divergence ◽  
Exponential Entropy

A divergence measure plays an important role in discriminating two probability distributions and drawing inferences based on such discrimination. This communication introduces one such divergence measure based on Jensen inequality and exponential entropy introduced by Pal and Pal in the settings of probability theory. Further, the idea has been generalized to fuzzy sets to introduce a new fuzzy divergence measure. Besides establishing the validity, some of its major properties are also studied. At last, the application of proposed fuzzy divergence measure is given in strategic decision-making.

scholarly journals HR Managers’ Emotions in Strategic Decision-Making Events: Evidence from Croatia

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 845
Author(s):  
Marli Gonan Božac ◽  
Katarina Kostelić
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Strategic Decision ◽  
Strategic Decision Making ◽  
Personal Perspective ◽  
Human Resource Managers ◽  
Organizational Perspective ◽  
Hr Managers ◽  
Experienced Emotion

The inclusion of emotions in the strategic decision-making research is long overdue. This paper deals with the emotions that human resource managers experience when they participate in a strategic problem-solving event or a strategic planning event. We examine the patterns in the intensity of experienced emotions with regard to event appraisal (from a personal perspective and the organization’s perspective), job satisfaction, and coexistence of emotions. The results reveal that enthusiasm is the most intensely experienced emotion for positively appraised strategic decision-making events, while frustration is the most intensely experienced emotion for negatively appraised problem-solving events, as is disappointment for strategic planning. The distinction between a personal and organizational perspective of the event appraisal reveals differences in experienced emotions, and the intensity of experienced anger is the best indicator of the difference in the event appraisals from the personal and organizational perspective. Both events reveal the variety of involved emotions and the coexistence of—not just various emotions, but also emotions of different dominant valence. The findings indicate that a strategic problem-solving event triggers greater emotional turmoil than a strategic planning event. The paper also discusses theoretical and practical implications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document