A Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach for Selecting the Multimodal Freight Transportation Routes

Author(s):  
Kwanjira Kaewfak ◽  
Van-Nam Huynh ◽  
Veeris Ammarapala ◽  
Chayakrit Charoensiriwath
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 12743
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hamza Naseem ◽  
Jiaqi Yang ◽  
Ziquan Xiang

In the past few years, reverse logistics practices have successfully managed to gain more attention in various industries and among supply chain researchers and experts. This is due to globalization, environmental concerns, and customer requirements, which have asserted industries’ concerns for reverse logistics management. In E-commerce, the process of reverse logistics originates with parcel refusal, undelivered goods, and exchanges. In developing countries like Pakistan, the adoption and implications of reverse logistics are still at their early stages. E-commerce companies give more attention to forward logistics and ignore logistics’ upstream flow in the supply chain. This study aims to identify, as well as list, the barriers and obtain the solutions to those identified barriers, and rank the barriers and their solutions so that logisticians and experts can solve them as per their priority. From the extensive literature review and experts’ opinions, we have found 14 barriers in implementing effective reverse logistics. Eight solutions to those barriers were also found from the literature review. This paper proposed the methodology based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (fuzzy-AHP), which used to get the weights of each barrier by using pairwise comparison, and fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (fuzzy-TOPSIS) method, which was adopted for the final ranking of solutions to reverse logistics. The case of the Pakistan E-commerce industry is used in the proposed method.


Author(s):  
Neeraj Chopra ◽  
Rajiv Sindwani ◽  
Manisha Goel

This investigation is done during COVID-19 to identify, rank, and classify MOOC (massive open online course) key acceptance factors (KAFs) from an Indian perspective. A systematic literature review identifies 11 KAFs of MOOC. One more novel factor named ‘contingent instructor' is proposed by the authors considering pandemic and new normal post-COVID-19. The paper implements two popular fuzzy MCDM (multiple-criteria decision-making) techniques, namely fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy AHP, on 12 KAFs. The fuzzy TOPSIS approach is used to rank factors. Affordability, performance expectancy and digital didactics are found as the top three KAFs. Fuzzy AHP classified KAFs into three groups, namely high, moderate, and low influential. Examination of the literature indicates that this study is among the first attempt to prioritize and classify MOOC KAFs using fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy AHP approach. The results offer managerial guidance to stakeholders for effective management of MOOC, resulting in higher acceptance rate. Likewise, this investigation will upgrade the comprehension of MOOC KAFs among academicians.


2020 ◽  
pp. 3-14
Author(s):  
Nikita Anatolyevich Osintsev ◽  
◽  
Alexander Nelyevich Rakhmangulov ◽  
Alexander Valentinovich Sladkowski ◽  
◽  
...  

The effective concept implementation of sustainable development in logistics and supply chain management is based on the use of management decision-making methods for changing the parameters of logistics flows using the green logistics instruments. Decisions should be made based on the measurement and evaluation of the indicators of these flows. The complexity of managing green supply chains is associated with insufficient knowledge of the system of logistics flows indicators and parameters, as well as methods and instruments for influencing these indicators. In the paper the use of the fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method for evaluating the performance of logistics flows in green supply chains is considered, as well as ranking of green logistics instruments, taking into account the degree of influence on logistics flows indicators. The work presents a calculation implementation example in the logistics flow control system of the procedure for ranking green logistic instruments.


2018 ◽  
Vol 283 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1517-1550 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. G. Venkatesh ◽  
Abraham Zhang ◽  
Eric Deakins ◽  
Sunil Luthra ◽  
S. Mangla

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document