Nuclear grade 316LN austenitic stainless steel weld joints were fabricated using conventional gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), activated flux gas tungsten arc welding (AGTAW), laser beam welding (LBW) and friction stir welding (FSW) processes. Assessment of weld beads was done by mechanical and metallurgical characterizations. Bead geometry and weld zones were studied by taking macrographs along the transverse side of the weld joints. Metallurgical features of different weld joints were carried out using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Microhardness distribution across four weld joints was recorded and hardness variations were compared. All weld zone, heat affected zone (HAZ) of GTAW and LBW, thermo-mechanically affected zone (TMAZ) of FSW processes, exhibited higher hardness values than the base metal. Reduced hardness was recorded at HAZ of AGTAW process. This was the result of a considerable grain growth. LBW joint showed the highest hardness value at the center of the fusion zone due to fine equiaxed dendrite morphology. Tensile and impact properties of different welding processes were evaluated and comparisons were made at room temperature. All weld samples displayed high yield strength (YS) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) with a lower percentage of elongation compared to that of the base metal. FSW joint showed improved YS, UTS and impact toughness compared to other weld joints. This is attributed to the formation of strain-free fine equiaxed grains at stir zone around 5 µm in size with subgrains of 2 µm in size by severe dynamic recrystallization mechanism. Among the fusion welding techniques, AGTAW process exhibited improved toughness, besides almost equal toughness of the base metal due to low δ-Ferrite with high austenite content. Fractography studies of the base metal and different weld samples were carried out by SEM analysis and features were compared.
In situ strain monitoring in gas tungsten arc welding processes