Quantum-Inspired Support Vector Machines for Human Activity Recognition in Industry 4.0

2022 ◽  
pp. 281-290
Author(s):  
Preeti Agarwal ◽  
Mansaf Alam
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machines ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Industry 4.0 ◽  
Human Activity Recognition ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Vector Machines

Smartphone Naïve Bayes Human Activity Recognition Using Personalized Datasets

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 685-702
Author(s):  
Moses L. Gadebe ◽  
◽  
Okuthe P. Kogeda ◽  
Sunday O. Ojo
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machines ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Human Activity Recognition ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
K Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Vector Machines

Recognizing human activity in real time with a limited dataset is possible on a resource-constrained device. However, most classification algorithms such as Support Vector Machines, C4.5, and K Nearest Neighbor require a large dataset to accurately predict human activities. In this paper, we present a novel real-time human activity recognition model based on Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB) algorithm using a personalized JavaScript object notation dataset extracted from the publicly available Physical Activity Monitoring for Aging People dataset and University of Southern California Human Activity dataset. With the proposed method, the personalized JSON training dataset is extracted and compressed into a 12×8 multi-dimensional array of the time-domain features extracted using a signal magnitude vector and tilt angles from tri-axial accelerometer sensor data. The algorithm is implemented on the Android platform using the Cordova cross-platform framework with HTML5 and JavaScript. Leave-one-activity-out cross validation is implemented as a testTrainer() function, the results of which are presented using a confusion matrix. The testTrainer() function leaves category K as the testing subset and the remaining K-1 as the training dataset to validate the proposed GNB algorithm. The proposed model is inexpensive in terms of memory and computational power owing to the use of a compressed small training dataset. Each K category was repeated five times and the algorithm consistently produced the same result for each test. The result of the simulation using the tilted angle features shows overall precision, recall, F-measure, and accuracy rates of 90%, 99.6%, 94.18%, and 89.51% respectively, in comparison to rates of 36.9%, 75%, 42%, and 36.9% when the signal magnitude vector features were used. The results of the simulations confirmed and proved that when using the tilt angle dataset, the GNB algorithm is superior to Support Vector Machines, C4.5, and K Nearest Neighbor algorithms.

scholarly journals HARTH: A Human Activity Recognition Dataset for Machine Learning

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (23) ◽  
pp. 7853
Author(s):  
Aleksej Logacjov ◽  
Kerstin Bach ◽  
Atle Kongsvold ◽  
Hilde Bremseth Bårdstu ◽  
Paul Jarle Mork
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Convolutional Neural Network ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Short Term Memory ◽  
Human Activity Recognition ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Free Living

Existing accelerometer-based human activity recognition (HAR) benchmark datasets that were recorded during free living suffer from non-fixed sensor placement, the usage of only one sensor, and unreliable annotations. We make two contributions in this work. First, we present the publicly available Human Activity Recognition Trondheim dataset (HARTH). Twenty-two participants were recorded for 90 to 120 min during their regular working hours using two three-axial accelerometers, attached to the thigh and lower back, and a chest-mounted camera. Experts annotated the data independently using the camera’s video signal and achieved high inter-rater agreement (Fleiss’ Kappa =0.96). They labeled twelve activities. The second contribution of this paper is the training of seven different baseline machine learning models for HAR on our dataset. We used a support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, random forest, extreme gradient boost, convolutional neural network, bidirectional long short-term memory, and convolutional neural network with multi-resolution blocks. The support vector machine achieved the best results with an F1-score of 0.81 (standard deviation: ±0.18), recall of 0.85±0.13, and precision of 0.79±0.22 in a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. Our highly professional recordings and annotations provide a promising benchmark dataset for researchers to develop innovative machine learning approaches for precise HAR in free living.

scholarly journals Comparison of Different Sets of Features for Human Activity Recognition by Wearable Sensors

Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 4189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samanta Rosati ◽  
Gabriella Balestra ◽  
Marco Knaflitz
Keyword(s):  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Wearable Sensors ◽  
Human Activity Recognition ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Time Frequency ◽  
Security Applications ◽  
Biomechanical Behavior ◽  
Area Of Interest ◽  
Open Point

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) refers to an emerging area of interest for medical, military, and security applications. However, the identification of the features to be used for activity classification and recognition is still an open point. The aim of this study was to compare two different feature sets for HAR. Particularly, we compared a set including time, frequency, and time-frequency domain features widely used in literature (FeatSet_A) with a set of time-domain features derived by considering the physical meaning of the acquired signals (FeatSet_B). The comparison of the two sets were based on the performances obtained using four machine learning classifiers. Sixty-one healthy subjects were asked to perform seven different daily activities wearing a MIMU-based device. Each signal was segmented using a 5-s window and for each window, 222 and 221 variables were extracted for the FeatSet_A and FeatSet_B respectively. Each set was reduced using a Genetic Algorithm (GA) simultaneously performing feature selection and classifier optimization. Our results showed that Support Vector Machine achieved the highest performances using both sets (97.1% and 96.7% for FeatSet_A and FeatSet_B respectively). However, FeatSet_B allows to better understand alterations of the biomechanical behavior in more complex situations, such as when applied to pathological subjects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document