Major Threats to Giant Pandas and Conservation Practices

2022 ◽  
pp. 105-116
Author(s):  
Fuwen Wei
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyun Shi ◽  
◽  
Guohua Song ◽  
Zeyu Li ◽  
◽  
...  

Ursus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Ke He ◽  
Qiang Dai ◽  
Andrew Foss-Grant ◽  
Eliezer Gurarie ◽  
William F. Fagan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. e01616
Author(s):  
Mingsheng Hong ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Jufeng Tang ◽  
Hong Zhou ◽  
Han Han ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Lizotte Jr ◽  
Lindsey M. W. Yasarer ◽  
Mark K. Griffith ◽  
Martin A. Locke ◽  
Ronald L. Bingner

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent ◽  
Lauren E. Oakes ◽  
Molly Cross ◽  
Shannon Hagerman

AbstractConservation practices during the first decade of the millennium predominantly focused on resisting changes and maintaining historical or current conditions, but ever-increasing impacts from climate change have highlighted the need for transformative action. However, little empirical evidence exists on what kinds of conservation actions aimed specifically at climate change adaptation are being implemented in practice, let alone how transformative these actions are. In response, we propose and trial a novel typology—the R–R–T scale, which improves on existing concepts of Resistance, Resilience, and Transformation—that enables the practical application of contested terms and the empirical assessment of whether and to what extent a shift toward transformative action is occurring. When applying the R–R–T scale to a case study of 104 adaptation projects funded since 2011, we find a trend towards transformation that varies across ecosystems. Our results reveal that perceptions about the acceptance of novel interventions in principle are beginning to be expressed in practice.


Author(s):  
Deepthi Kolady ◽  
Weiwei Zhang ◽  
Tong Wang ◽  
Jessica Ulrich-Schad

Abstract This study uses location-specific data to investigate the role of spatially mediated peer effects in farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture practices. The literature has shown that farmers trust other farmers and one way to increase conservation practice adoption is through identifying feasible conservation practices in neighboring fields. Estimating this effect can help improve our understanding of what influences the adoption and could play a role in improving federal and local conservation program design. The study finds that although spatial peer effects are important in the adoption of conservation tillage and diverse crop rotation, the scale of peer effects are not substantial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document