Developing Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Mathematics Knowledge (TPMK) to Build Students’ Capacity to Think and Communicate in Mathematics Classrooms

2016 ◽  
pp. 129-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina Wee Ping Lim ◽  
Puay Leng Ang ◽  
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh
2007 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 380-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meg Schleppenbach ◽  
Michelle Perry ◽  
Kevin F. Miller ◽  
Linda Sims ◽  
Ge Fang

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kellie M. Mullaney ◽  
Samuel R. White ◽  
Shana K. Carpenter

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan L. Franke ◽  
Noreen M. Webb ◽  
Angela Chan ◽  
Dan Battey ◽  
Marsha Ing ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Pereira Lobo

We present a list of mathematical results for future implementation in a digital Open Mathematics Knowledge Base.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Robert Weinhandl ◽  
Zsolt Lavicza ◽  
Stefanie Schallert

Challenges for students in the 21st century, such as acquiring technology, problem-solving and cooperation skills, also necessitates changes in mathematics education to be able to respond to changing educational needs. One way to respond to these challenges is utilising recent educational innovations in schools, for instance, among others are flipped learning (FL) approaches. In this paper, we outline our explorative educational experiment that aims to investigate key elements of mathematics learning in FL approaches in upper secondary education. We describe the methodologies and findings of our qualitative study based on design-based research to discover key elements of FL approaches in upper secondary education. Analysing the data collected over ten months suggested categories (a) confidence when learning; (b) learning by working; and (c) flexibility when learning could be essential to understand FL approaches practices in mathematics classrooms.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Boaler ◽  
Sarah Kate Selling

In a previous study of 2 schools in England that taught mathematics very differently, the first author found that a project-based mathematics approach resulted in higher achievement, greater understanding, and more appreciation of mathematics than a traditional approach. In this follow-up study, the first author contacted and interviewed a group of adults 8 years after they had left the 2 schools to investigate their knowledge use in life. This showed that the young adults who had experienced the 2 mathematics teaching approaches developed profoundly different relationships with mathematics knowledge that contributed towards the shaping of different identities as learners and users of mathematics (Boaler & Greeno, 2000). The adults from the project-based school had also moved into significantly more professional jobs, despite living in one of the lowest income areas of the country. In this article, we consider the different opportunities that the 2 school approaches offered for longterm relationships with mathematics and different forms of mathematical expertise that are differentially useful in the 21st century (Hatano & Oura, 2003).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document