Water Governance: A Pragmatic Debate of 21st Century; An Indian Perspective

Author(s):  
Omi Kumari ◽  
Manish Kumar
2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-18
Author(s):  
Maria Krzysztof Byrski

Collegium Civitas; University of WarsawThe basic presumption is the need in Oriental studies to go much further than mere description of different civilisations. They should be compared with our own, and the question of whether the concepts evolved by those civilisations can help us better understand the reality in which we actually happen to live should be asked. For the adoption of this approach to the study of South Asia, it is suggested that European and Indian civilisations are ‘twins-unlike’. The paradox is intended since certain—so to say—general structural aspects of both civilisations are similar (geographical magnitude, variety of climate, size of population, and its anthropological, ethnic, linguistic and religious diversity), but as far as content is concerned they are of course very much unlike each other. The conclusion of our comparison is that Indian traditional civilisation is that of sustenance and containment while the European one is that of progress, development and expansion. Proper synergy of the two tendencies is postulated for sustainable development to be achieved.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Varady ◽  
Andrea Gerlak ◽  
Arin Haverland

AbstractIn the first decade of the 21st century, 'hydrosolidarity,' the notion that water management should include considerations of ethics and equity, has influenced international approaches to conducting environmental research and formulating water policy. Since its inception in the 1990s, the term appears frequently across a spectrum of water-related research. It has accordingly permeated discourses and publications on water management. Such rapid proliferation of the concept has helped usher in a wave of transition from conflict management to cooperative efforts between upstream and downstream basin users, as well as a complex paradigm that links both human and environmental welfare. In this paper, we trace the intellectual origins and changing conceptions of hydrosolidarity. We outline some of its applications as well as various reactions to the concept. We close by discussing how the concept can help frame negotiations between riparian states and influence treaty-making and institution-building in river basin settings.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 24-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria D. Kellum ◽  
Sue T. Hale

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 400-400
Author(s):  
Mark R. Young ◽  
Andrew R. Bullock ◽  
Rafael Bouet ◽  
John A. Petros ◽  
Muta M. Issa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document