The impact of gender and sex-role orientation on responses to dissatisfaction in close relationships

Sex Roles ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caryl E. Rusbult ◽  
Isabella M. Zembrodt ◽  
John Iwaniszek
2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-92
Author(s):  
Rosen john

In the October-December 1999 issue of Vikalpa (Vol 24, No 4), we had published an article titled “Fear of Success among Women Managers” by Sanghamitra Buddhapriya, which was an attempt to study the impact of managerial level and sex-role orientation on fear of success. In this rejoinder to her article, Rosen John discusses some of the shortcomings of the article especially with regard to the choice of sampling techniques selected and the narrow spectrum from which the respondents were chosen.


1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg J Neimeyer ◽  
Michael T Brown ◽  
April E Metzler ◽  
Carol Hagans ◽  
Marianna Tanguy

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 17-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghamitra Buddhapriya

Fear of success is regarded as a major problem facing women managers in the organizational setting. Such female-specific fear of success motive originates from sex-role socialization process. In the present study, an attempt is made to study the impact of managerial level and sex-role orientation on fear of success. The study is based on an empirical investigation conducted among 160 women managers from senior, middle, and junior levels of management from 10 major PSUs. Contrary to expectations, the results reveal that the average score of women managers on fear of success is low and managerial level does not have any significant influence on it. However, sex-role orientation is found to be having significant influence on fear of success. Androgynous and masculine sex-role type women managers experienced much less fear of success than the feminine sex-role type.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Nelson ◽  
Travis Martin ◽  
Deena Oaks ◽  
Rebecca Stuver ◽  
Rick Wright

1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Davidson ◽  
Donna L. Sollie

The relationship between sex-role orientation and marital adjustment was investigated. Using a sample of 112 married couples, husbands and wives separately completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. The hypotheses tested were based on the assumption that an androgynous sex-role orientation, which incorporates both instrumental and expressive capacities, would be most positively related to self and spouse's marital adjustment, while an undifferentiated orientation would be least related. Results indicated that in general both androgynous and sex-typed individuals and their spouses were significantly higher in marital adjustment than were undifferentiated individuals and their spouses. In addition, spousal sex-role types were found to be related and couples in which both partners were classified as undifferentiated reported the lowest levels of marital adjustment while androgynous couples and sex-typed couples reported greater levels of marital adjustment. The results were discussed in relation to their support for a symbolic interaction/ role theory interpretation of the association between sex-role orientation and marital adjustment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document