Evaluation of an enzyme-immunoassay for prostatic acid phosphatase utilizing monoclonal antibodies

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Oosterom ◽  
B. Leijnse ◽  
J. Bogdanowicz ◽  
F. H. Schroeder
1986 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1832-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
P C Patel ◽  
L Aubin ◽  
J Côte

Abstract We investigated two techniques of immunoblotting--the Western blot and the dot blot--for use in detecting prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP, EC 3.1.3.2). We used polyclonal antisera to human PAP, produced in rabbits by hyperimmunization with purified PAP, and PAP-specific monoclonal antibodies in the immunoenzymatic protocols. We conclude that PAP can be readily detected by Western blots with use of polyclonal antisera, but not with monoclonal antibodies. On the other hand, using a dot blot assay, we could easily detect PAP with both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies.


Urology ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 469-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayda M.F. El-Shirbiny ◽  
P. Shridhar ◽  
M.S. Al Adnani ◽  
L.K. Suresh

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 189-192
Author(s):  
B. J. Schmitz-Dr�ger ◽  
G. Baur ◽  
Th. Ebert ◽  
G. Pfleiderer ◽  
R. Ackermann

1982 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Y Naritoku ◽  
C R Taylor

The use of immunohistochemical methods has been advocated for the detection and localization of prostatic acid phosphatase in paraffin sections of human prostate. This article explores the possible advantages of utilizing monoclonal antibodies in this method. Monoclonal antibodies, specific for human prostatic acid phosphatase, were integrated into three different immunohistochemical procedures. In the first method, a three-layer peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) system was employed; the monoclonal antibody was followed by rabbit bridge antibody directed against mouse immunoglobulin and mouse PAP complex. The second method was a three-layer system utilizing biotin-labeled horse anti-mouse antibody as "bridge" antiserum between the primary monoclonal antibody and an avidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase complex. The third method was a four-layer system; the monoclonal antibody was followed by rabbit anti-mouse serum, swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulin as the bridge antibody and rabbit PAP complex. It was found that some, but not all, monoclonal antibodies can be used for the detection of prostatic acid phosphatase in paraffin sections. The four-layer PAP method was found to be the most sensitive method of the three systems tested; however, the avidin-biotin method required the least amount of time. No significant difference in the quality of staining was observed between monoclonal antibodies and carefully absorbed conventional antiserum.


1981 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.H. Cooper ◽  
R. Glashan ◽  
M.R.G. Robinson ◽  
D.B. Morgan ◽  
K. Trautner

1985 ◽  
Vol 84 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Yamaura ◽  
Masanao Makino ◽  
Linda J. Walsh ◽  
Andrew W. Bruce ◽  
Byung-Kil Choe

1986 ◽  
Vol 111 (S1) ◽  
pp. S141-S141
Author(s):  
B. J. Schmitz-Dräger ◽  
G. Baur ◽  
T. Ebert ◽  
G. Pfleiderer ◽  
R. Ackermann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document