Generation of Monoclonal Antibodies to Prostatic Acid Phosphatase Isoenzyme 2 And Application in Solid-Phase Enzyme Immunoassay

1989 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
CY Kuo ◽  
KW Chen ◽  
J. Fu ◽  
KW Lam ◽  
CY Lee
1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Oosterom ◽  
B. Leijnse ◽  
J. Bogdanowicz ◽  
F. H. Schroeder

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 189-192
Author(s):  
B. J. Schmitz-Dr�ger ◽  
G. Baur ◽  
Th. Ebert ◽  
G. Pfleiderer ◽  
R. Ackermann

1986 ◽  
Vol 111 (S1) ◽  
pp. S141-S141
Author(s):  
B. J. Schmitz-Dräger ◽  
G. Baur ◽  
T. Ebert ◽  
G. Pfleiderer ◽  
R. Ackermann

1986 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1832-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
P C Patel ◽  
L Aubin ◽  
J Côte

Abstract We investigated two techniques of immunoblotting--the Western blot and the dot blot--for use in detecting prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP, EC 3.1.3.2). We used polyclonal antisera to human PAP, produced in rabbits by hyperimmunization with purified PAP, and PAP-specific monoclonal antibodies in the immunoenzymatic protocols. We conclude that PAP can be readily detected by Western blots with use of polyclonal antisera, but not with monoclonal antibodies. On the other hand, using a dot blot assay, we could easily detect PAP with both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies.


1982 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 596-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Gericke ◽  
K P Kohse ◽  
G Pfleiderer ◽  
S H Flüchter ◽  
K H Bichler

Abstract In this assay we used polystyrene-tube-attached rabbit antibodies against prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) that had been purified to homogeneity from human prostate. The amount of immunoreactive acid phosphatase was determined directly by its enzymic activity in the solid-phase-bound immune complex. The detection limit was 0.05 U/L (0.13 microgram/L), the CVs between 4.3 and 10.8%. Investigating the organ specificity of PAP, we found that some cross-reacting acid phosphatase activity could be so measured in human kidney, leukocytes, and platelets, all of which probably contribute to the circulating "prostatic" acid phosphatase that normally is present in serum. Diurnal and day-to-day variations in serum PAP activity were as much as 100% in healthy subjects. Individuals without prostatic diseases (n = 92) had values for serum PAP activity up to 0.36 U/L (0.94 microgram/L), in an age-independent distribution; patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 62) showed values up to 0.48 U/L (1.25 micrograms/L). With PAP activity of 0.38 U/L or 1.0 microgram/L (90th percentile of the prostatic group) as the upper limit of "normality," overall sensitivity (stages A-D) for detection of prostatic cancer in 33 essentially untreated patients was 65%. Examples for the followup of therapy of prostatic cancer by measurement of serum PAP with this assay are described.


1983 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Hérion ◽  
D. Portetelle ◽  
J. -D. Franssen ◽  
J. Urbain ◽  
A. Bollen

Using two monoclonal antibodies directed against urokinase, we have developed a micro enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) to detect and measure urokinase in biological fluids. The system presents the following characteristics: simple and rapid procedure, reproducibility, sensitivity (urokinase levels down to 1 ng/ml) and evaluation of the enzyme in biological fluids such as urine, pleural elfusions, and ascitic fluids without preliminary purification.


Urology ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 469-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayda M.F. El-Shirbiny ◽  
P. Shridhar ◽  
M.S. Al Adnani ◽  
L.K. Suresh

1982 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Y Naritoku ◽  
C R Taylor

The use of immunohistochemical methods has been advocated for the detection and localization of prostatic acid phosphatase in paraffin sections of human prostate. This article explores the possible advantages of utilizing monoclonal antibodies in this method. Monoclonal antibodies, specific for human prostatic acid phosphatase, were integrated into three different immunohistochemical procedures. In the first method, a three-layer peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) system was employed; the monoclonal antibody was followed by rabbit bridge antibody directed against mouse immunoglobulin and mouse PAP complex. The second method was a three-layer system utilizing biotin-labeled horse anti-mouse antibody as "bridge" antiserum between the primary monoclonal antibody and an avidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase complex. The third method was a four-layer system; the monoclonal antibody was followed by rabbit anti-mouse serum, swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulin as the bridge antibody and rabbit PAP complex. It was found that some, but not all, monoclonal antibodies can be used for the detection of prostatic acid phosphatase in paraffin sections. The four-layer PAP method was found to be the most sensitive method of the three systems tested; however, the avidin-biotin method required the least amount of time. No significant difference in the quality of staining was observed between monoclonal antibodies and carefully absorbed conventional antiserum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document