Can some facial rejuvenation techniques cause latrogenia?

1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael de la Plaza ◽  
L. de la Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Facial Rejuvenation

Facial Rejuvenation

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gady Har-El ◽  
Terry A. Day ◽  
Cherie-Ann O. Nathan
Keyword(s):  
Facial Rejuvenation

Facial Rejuvenation

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz Barton
Keyword(s):  
Facial Rejuvenation

1540‐nm fractional erbium: Glass laser is a safe and effective modality for nonablative facial rejuvenation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efrat Solomon‐Cohen ◽  
Moshe Lapidoth ◽  
Daniel Mimouni ◽  
Lehavit Akerman ◽  
Dan Slodownik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Facial Rejuvenation ◽  
Glass Laser ◽  
Erbium Glass

scholarly journals Use of PRP, PRF and CGF in Periodontal Regeneration and Facial Rejuvenation—A Narrative Review

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 317
Author(s):  
Eitan Mijiritsky ◽  
Haya Drora Assaf ◽  
Oren Peleg ◽  
Maayan Shacham ◽  
Loredana Cerroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factors ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Periodontal Regeneration ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Facial Rejuvenation ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
The Past ◽  
Autologous Platelet

Growth factors (GFs) play a vital role in cell proliferation, migration, differentiation and angiogenesis. Autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) which contain high levels of GFs make them especially suitable for periodontal regeneration and facial rejuvenation. The main generations of APCs presented are platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and concentrated growth factor (CGF) techniques. The purpose of this review is to provide the clinician with an overview of APCs’ evolution over the past decade in order to give reliable and useful information to be used in clinical work. This review summarizes the most interesting and novel articles published between 1997 and 2020. Electronic and manual searches were conducted in the following databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Embase. The following keywords were used: growth factors, VEGF, TGF-b1, PRP, PRF, CGF and periodontal regeneration and/or facial rejuvenation. A total of 73 articles were finally included. The review then addresses the uses of the three different techniques in the two disciplines, as well as the advantages and limitations of each technique. Overall, PRP is mainly used in cases of hard and soft tissue procedures, while PRF is used in gingival recession and the treatment of furcation and intrabony defects; CGF is mainly used in bone regeneration.

scholarly journals Facial Rejuvenation with Concentrated Lipograft—A 12 Month Follow-Up Study

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 594
Author(s):  
Lukas Prantl ◽  
Eva Brix ◽  
Sally Kempa ◽  
Oliver Felthaus ◽  
Andreas Eigenberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stromal Vascular Fraction ◽  
Facial Rejuvenation ◽  
Fat Graft ◽  
Volume Loss ◽  
Patient’S Satisfaction ◽  
Resazurin Assay ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The Difference

Lipofilling is a popular technique to treat volume loss in aging patients. The isolated adipose tissue is composed of adipocytes and stromal vascular fraction cells, which include adipose-derived stem cells (ASC). We hypothesize that the patient’s wrinkle severity scale (WSS) and patient’s satisfaction on the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) can be improved after using concentrated lipoaspirate. Fourteen patients (54 years ± 11.09 years) with volume loss in the midface area underwent waterjet-assisted liposuction (Human Med AG, Schwerin, Germany). Fat was centrifuged in an ACP Double Syringe (Arthrex GmbH, Munich, Germany) using Rotofix 32A centrifuge (Andreas Hettich, GmbH & Co.KG, Tuttlingen, Germany). Homogenization was performed using the double syringe and a 1.4 mm female–female luerlock connector. After a second centrifugation, patients received periorbital (PO) and nasolabial (NL) lipografting. ASC count was performed after enzymatical digestion. Vitality of cells was assessed using a resazurin assay. During long-term follow up (12 months, n = 10), we found a high patient’s satisfaction (GAIS 1+/−0.52) and a good improvement of the WSS during short- and long-term follow-up. The ASC count of processed lipoaspirate was 2.1-fold higher than of unprocessed lipoaspirate (p < 0.001). The difference of ASC in sedimented and simply centrifuged lipoaspirate was also significant (p < 0.05). Facial rejuvenation with concentrated fat graft offers good results concerning objective aesthetic outcome and patient’s satisfaction.

scholarly journals Fat Augmentation as Adjunct to CORE Facelift Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Capi C. Wever
Keyword(s):  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Facial Rejuvenation ◽  
Golden Standard ◽  
The Face

AbstractRuling out cases with strong jawlines, well-developed mid-cheek regions, and good fat presence, if done artistically, fat augmentation strongly assists midface definition and can replenish hollowed regions of the face. This is particularly true for candidates with low bodyfat or smaller skull structures. Hence, fat grafting is a strong adjunct to conventional excisional techniques in facial rejuvenation surgery, regardless of experience, technique, or geographical embedding. While CORE facelift techniques remain the golden standard that define the top level of facelift surgery, fat augmentation has its unique place along the full stretch of an individual surgeon's learning scope, as it will potentially improve results regardless of where one stands.

Facial rejuvenation.

1997 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 559
Author(s):  
M. A. Mendez-Fernandez
Keyword(s):  
Facial Rejuvenation

Diplopia Associated With the Cosmetic Use of Botulinum Toxin A for Facial Rejuvenation

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros Aristodemou ◽  
Linda Watt ◽  
Claire Baldwin ◽  
Charles Hugkulstone
Keyword(s):  
Botulinum Toxin ◽  
Botulinum Toxin A ◽  
Facial Rejuvenation ◽  
Toxin A
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document