Finite reduced hydrodynamic equations in the slow-motion approximation to general relativity. Part II. Radiation reaction and higher-order divergent terms

1980 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 521-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. David Kerlick
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (29) ◽  
pp. 5399-5408 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. IORIO ◽  
M. L. RUGGIERO

We focus on Hořava–Lifshitz (HL) theory of gravity, and, in particular, on the Kehagias and Sfetsos's solution that is the analog of Schwarzschild black hole of General Relativity. In the weak-field and slow-motion approximation, we analytically work out the secular precession of the longitude of the pericentre ϖ of a test particle induced by this solution. Its analytical form is different from that of the general relativistic Einstein's pericentre precession. Then, we compare it to the latest determinations of the corrections [Formula: see text] to the standard Newtonian/Einsteinian planetary perihelion precessions recently estimated by E. V. Pitjeva with the EPM2008 ephemerides. It turns out that the planets of the solar system, taken singularly one at a time, allow one to put lower bounds on the adimensional HL parameter ψ0 of the order of 10-12(Mercury)-10-24 (Pluto). They are not able to account for the Pioneer anomalous acceleration for r > 20 AU.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 2135-2147 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Y. Lo

General relativity is incomplete since it does not include the gravitational radiation reaction force and the interaction of gravitation with charged particles. General relativity is confusing because Einstein's covariance principle is invalid in physics. Moreover, there is no bounded dynamic solution for the Einstein equation. Thus, Gullstrand is right and the 1993 Nobel Prize for Physics press release is incorrect. Moreover, awards to Christodoulou reflect the blind faith toward Einstein and accumulated errors in mathematics. Note that the Einstein equation with an electromagnetic wave source has no valid solution unless a photonic energy-stress tensor with an anti-gravitational coupling is added. Thus, the photonic energy includes gravitational energy. The existence of anti-gravity coupling implies that the energy conditions in space-time singularity theorems of Hawking and Penrose cannot be satisfied, and thus are irrelevant. Also, the positive mass theorem of Yau and Schoen is misleading, though considered as an achievement by the Fields Medal. E = mc2 is invalid for the electromagnetic energy alone. The discovery of the charge-mass interaction establishes the need for unification of electromagnetism and gravitation and would explain many puzzles. Experimental investigations for further results are important.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. G. L. Nashed ◽  
S. D. Odintsov ◽  
V. K. Oikonomou

AbstractIn this paper we shall consider spherically symmetric spacetime solutions describing the interior of stellar compact objects, in the context of higher-order curvature theory of the $${{\mathrm {f(R)}}}$$ f ( R ) type. We shall derive the non-vacuum field equations of the higher-order curvature theory, without assuming any specific form of the $${{\mathrm {f(R)}}}$$ f ( R ) theory, specifying the analysis for a spherically symmetric spacetime with two unknown functions. We obtain a system of highly non-linear differential equations, which consists of four differential equations with six unknown functions. To solve such a system, we assume a specific form of metric potentials, using the Krori–Barua ansatz. We successfully solve the system of differential equations, and we derive all the components of the energy–momentum tensor. Moreover, we derive the non-trivial general form of $${{\mathrm {f(R)}}}$$ f ( R ) that may generate such solutions and calculate the dynamic Ricci scalar of the anisotropic star. Accordingly, we calculate the asymptotic form of the function $${\mathrm {f(R)}}$$ f ( R ) , which is a polynomial function. We match the derived interior solution with the exterior one, which was derived in [1], with the latter also resulting to a non-trivial form of the Ricci scalar. Notably but rather expected, the exterior solution differs from the Schwarzschild one in the context of general relativity. The matching procedure will eventually relate two constants with the mass and radius of the compact stellar object. We list the necessary conditions that any compact anisotropic star must satisfy and explain in detail that our model bypasses all of these conditions for a special compact star $$\textit{Her X--1}$$ Her X - - 1 , which has an estimated mass and radius $$(mass = 0.85 \pm 0.15M_{\circledcirc }\ and\ radius = 8.1 \pm 0.41~\text {km}$$ ( m a s s = 0.85 ± 0.15 M ⊚ a n d r a d i u s = 8.1 ± 0.41 km ). Moreover, we study the stability of this model by using the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equation and adiabatic index, and we show that the considered model is different and more stable compared to the corresponding models in the context of general relativity.


2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1139-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Kozameh ◽  
Ezra T. Newman ◽  
Raul Ortega ◽  
Gilberto Silva-Ortigoza

2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 016904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leor Barack ◽  
Adam Pound

1986 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bertotti

Following some work by N. Ashby and myself, it is shown how the Fermi construction of local inertial frames can be generalized, in the slow motion approximation, to the neighbourhood of the earth. This allows a clear and simple description of the relativistic effects for the motion of an earth satellite. A proposal by I. Ciufolini to measure the relativistic precession is reviewed.


2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Kalies ◽  
Robert C.A.M. VanderVorst ◽  
Thomas Wanner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document