Response to ?community psychiatry training for general psychiatry residents?

1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-79
Author(s):  
Carl C. Bell
2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
L.C. Castro

Background:It is widely recognized the importance of Consultation Liaison (C-L) training for general psychiatry residents. The present International and European panorama is diverse among countries which reflect different cultural, historical and political backgrounds.Aim:To present the postgraduate training in C-L Psychiatry during Psychiatry Residency in Portugal and discuss it in a trans-european perspective.Methods:Review of the literature. MEDLINE and PubMed databases searches, using combinations of the Medline Subject Heading terms consultation-liaison psychiatry and training, residency, internship.Results:In Portugal, during postgraduate training, rotation to a C-L psychiatry service is mandatory, with a minimal duration of three months. It is possible to prolong the duration of the stage for several months as an optional rotation training. National psychiatric directives define generally the core competencies and skills to acquire during the C-L Psychiatry training. There are no specific national guidelines for C-L Psychiatry training. There is no C-L Psychiatry speciality or sub-speciality. Liaison Psychiatry is practised in general hospitals where there is a psychiatric unit.Conclusions:Portuguese psychiatry residents are exposed to C-L work as part of their clinical experience in general psychiatry as the national psychiatry residency training program include three months minimum of compulsory training in C-L Psychiatry in a general hospital. It is crucial to reflect on training issues in C-L Psychiatry in Portugal and Europe, since it is a step to a common path of higher quality and homogeneity of training across european countries.


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 1275-1278
Author(s):  
Claudia L. Reardon ◽  
Kevin A. Buhr ◽  
Robert M. Factor ◽  
Art Walaszek ◽  
Elizabeth Zeidler Schreiter

1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 623-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Johnston ◽  
Tammy Binder ◽  
Alison Freeland ◽  
Katherine Gillis

Objective To demonstrate how an experience of partnership evolved when a group of psychiatry residents moved beyond the traditional hospital setting and began to question their current training. Method We describe our experience in the context of the current literature and suggest ways of implementing community psychiatry training in existing residency programs. Results Principles of community psychiatry — partnership, respect and shared responsibility — are good standards in psychiatric care. Conclusions Community psychiatry training may be possible in existing resident rotations, although teaching in the community setting may also be of value. Research and clinical work in “community psychiatry” need to be valued. Problems may be enriching if they are resolved collaboratively.


Author(s):  
Natalie Beath ◽  
Karis Moxley ◽  
Ugasvaree Subramaney ◽  
Zukiswa Zingela ◽  
Bonginkosi Chiliza ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 642-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann C. Schwartz ◽  
Amber Frank ◽  
Justine W. Welsh ◽  
Kelly Blankenship ◽  
Sandra M. DeJong

Author(s):  
Tobias Wasser ◽  
Saksham Chandra ◽  
Katherine Michaelsen

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review the impact of a new, brief forensic rotation for general psychiatry residents on the variety of residents’ forensic exposures. Design/methodology/approach The authors surveyed residents who trained before and after the implementation of the new rotation to assess the impact of the rotation on the residents’ forensic experiences during training across a variety of domains. Findings Even in a highly clinical forensic setting, residents participating in the required rotation reported significantly greater variety of forensic experiences than those who had not completed the required rotation, including types of settings and assessments, Rotation completers reported greater exposure to various types of settings and assessments, and courtroom-related experiences, as well as the overall number of forensic exposures. The two groups did not differ in their forensic exposures in general psychiatry settings, civil-forensic evaluations or diverse forensic populations. Secondary analyses showed that increased exposure to court-based experiences and multiple forensic settings was associated with forensic fellowship interest. Originality/value This study demonstrates that a brief, mandatory forensic clinical rotation may increase residents’ exposure to forensic settings, assessments and courtroom-related experiences and that increased exposure to courtroom-based experiences in particular may increase interest in forensic fellowship. While not surprising, the results demonstrate that residents were not otherwise having these forensic experiences and that even time-limited forensic rotations can enhance the breadth of residents’ forensic exposures. Further, the rotation achieved these outcomes without using typical forensic sites but instead highly clinical sites, which may be particularly encouraging to residency programs without ready access to classic forensic rotation sites. This study contributes to the small but expanding body of the literature describing the value of increasing psychiatry residents’ training in clinical forensic psychiatry.


1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 539-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Macleod

This article describes the findings of a survey of Child Psychiatry Training Programs conducted by the Education and Training Committee of the Canadian Academy of Child Psychiatry. The objectives of the Committee are identified to include teaching programs for career trainees, residents in general psychiatry, and special groups such as pediatric and family medicine residents. Information obtained on available programs for each group is outlined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document