Periods of modular forms and Jacobi theta functions

1991 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 449-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don Zagier
1980 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Maher

In this paper we construct modular forms from combinatorial designs, and codes over finite fields. We construct codes from designs, and lattices from codes. Then we use the combinatorial properties of the designs and the weight (or shape) structures of the codes to study the theta functions of the associated lattices. These theta functions are shown to be modular forms for the modular group or for various congruence subgroups. The levels of the forms we examine are determined by the dimensions of the codes and the characteristics of the fields. Using the Lee polynomial of the codes we can write the theta functions as homogeneous polynomials in modified Jacobi theta functions. By extending the underlying combinatorial structure, a modular form of half-integral weight is associated with a modular form of integral weight.


2021 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. V. Ferapontov ◽  
M. V. Pavlov ◽  
Lingling Xue

AbstractWe investigate the integrability of Euler–Lagrange equations associated with 2D second-order Lagrangians of the form $$\begin{aligned} \int f(u_{xx},u_{xy},u_{yy})\ \mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}y. \end{aligned}$$ ∫ f ( u xx , u xy , u yy ) d x d y . By deriving integrability conditions for the Lagrangian density f, examples of integrable Lagrangians expressible via elementary functions, Jacobi theta functions and dilogarithms are constructed. A link of second-order integrable Lagrangians to WDVV equations is established. Generalisations to 3D second-order integrable Lagrangians are also discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Males ◽  
Andreas Mono ◽  
Larry Rolen

Abstract In the theory of harmonic Maaß forms and mock modular forms, mock theta functions are distinguished examples which arose from q-hypergeometric examples of Ramanujan. Recently, there has been a body of work on higher depth mock modular forms. Here, we introduce distinguished examples of these forms, which we call higher depth mock theta functions, and develop q-hypergeometric expressions for them. We provide three examples of mock theta functions of depth two, each arising by multiplying a classical mock theta function with a certain specialization of a universal mock theta function. In addition, we give their modular completions, and relate each to a q-hypergeometric series.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (08) ◽  
pp. 2097-2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubho Banerjee ◽  
Blake Wilkerson

We study the Lambert series [Formula: see text], for all [Formula: see text]. We obtain the complete asymptotic expansion of [Formula: see text] near [Formula: see text]. Our analysis of the Lambert series yields the asymptotic forms for several related [Formula: see text]-series: the [Formula: see text]-gamma and [Formula: see text]-polygamma functions, the [Formula: see text]-Pochhammer symbol and the Jacobi theta functions. Some typical results include [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], with relative errors of order [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] respectively.


2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 295-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Bringmann ◽  
Amanda Folsom ◽  
Robert C. Rhoades

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 571-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Funke ◽  
John Millson

AbstractIn our previous paper [J. Funke and J. Millson, Cycles with local coefficients for orthogonal groups and vector-valued Siegel modular forms, American J. Math. 128 (2006), 899–948], we established a correspondence between vector-valued holomorphic Siegel modular forms and cohomology with local coefficients for local symmetric spaces $X$ attached to real orthogonal groups of type $(p, q)$. This correspondence is realized using theta functions associated with explicitly constructed ‘special’ Schwartz forms. Furthermore, the theta functions give rise to generating series of certain ‘special cycles’ in $X$ with coefficients.In this paper, we study the boundary behaviour of these theta functions in the non-compact case and show that the theta functions extend to the Borel–Sere compactification $ \overline{X} $ of $X$. However, for the $ \mathbb{Q} $-split case for signature $(p, p)$, we have to construct and consider a slightly larger compactification, the ‘big’ Borel–Serre compactification. The restriction to each face of $ \overline{X} $ is again a theta series as in [J. Funke and J. Millson, loc. cit.], now for a smaller orthogonal group and a larger coefficient system.As an application we establish in certain cases the cohomological non-vanishing of the special (co)cycles when passing to an appropriate finite cover of $X$. In particular, the (co)homology groups in question do not vanish. We deduce as a consequence a sharp non-vanishing theorem for ${L}^{2} $-cohomology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document