Anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant in patients treated with different methods of renal replacement therapy in comparison to patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

1992 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sitter ◽  
M. Spannagl ◽  
H. Schiffl
2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary W. Moore ◽  
Savita Rangarajan ◽  
Geoffrey F. Savidge

Lupus anticoagulants are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies detected by their effects on phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays. Persistent lupus anticoagulants are associated with thrombotic disease, but not all are clinically significant. Antibody heterogeneity and reagent and test variability dictate that at least 2 tests, of different types, should be used to screen lupus anticoagulants. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay detects clinically significant antibodies. Eighty-two patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 32 with systemic lupus erythematosus + positive for activated seven lupus anticoagulant and who were without thrombosis, who were positive by activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay, were investigated for lupus anticoagulants by dilute Russell's viper venom time, dilute activated partial thromboplastin time, and Taipan snake venom time, and for anticardiolipin antibodies. Fifty-seven of the APS patients were positive for lupus anticoagulants in multiple assays, 25 in activated seven lupus anticoagulant alone. Fourteen of the latter group were previously positive in other antiphospholipid antibodies assays, and 11 had only been positive for lupus anticoagulants by activated seven lupus anticoagulant. Twenty-eight had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies, 6 of whom were from the group that was positive in activated seven lupus anticoagulant only. Eight of the systemic lupus erythematosus + lupus anticoagulants (without thrombosis) patients were positive for lupus anticoagulant by activated seven lupus anticoagulant alone and had only been positive in activated seven lupus anticoagulant previously, and none had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies. The remaining 24 patients were lupus-anticoagulant positive in multiple assays, and 9 had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies. Dilute Russell's viper venom time and Dilute activated partial thromboplastin time are widely used to detect lupus anticoagulants and are considered to detect clinically significant antibodies. Activated seven lupus anticoagulant detected antibodies in APS patients who were positive by these assays and also lupus anticoagulants undetectable by the dilute Russell's viper venom time/dilute activated partial thromboplastin time reagents used, demonstrating its utility as a first-line or second-line assay.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2382-2389 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANNA BRODER ◽  
SAAKSHI KHATTRI ◽  
RUCHIKA PATEL ◽  
CHAIM PUTTERMAN

Objective.In a cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with endstage renal failure, to evaluate whether continuing rheumatology followup visits and immunosuppressive therapy after starting renal replacement were associated with increased survival.Methods.We identified all SLE patients over 21 years old who started renal replacement therapy between 2005 and 2011 at an urban tertiary care center. Mortality data were obtained using in-hospital records and the US Social Security Death Index database.Results.We identified 80 SLE patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. Twenty-two patients (28%) were followed in rheumatology clinics frequently (2 or more visits per year) after starting renal replacement therapy, and 58 patients (72%) were followed infrequently (fewer than 2 visits per year). Survival rates were significantly higher in transplant patients compared with dialysis patients. Patients with SLE followed frequently after starting dialysis had significantly higher 4-year survival rates compared with patients followed infrequently after starting dialysis (log-rank p = 0.03). In the Cox proportional hazards model, treatment with prednisone alone or with no medication was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of death = 6.1 (95% CI 1.1, 34; p = 0.04) and HR = 13 (95% CI 1.5, 106; p = 0.02), respectively, compared with patients treated with a combination of immunosuppressive therapy with or without prednisone, adjusted for age at SLE diagnosis, sex, transplant status, and the frequency of rheumatology visits after the development of endstage renal failure.Conclusion.Active disease in patients with SLE undergoing renal replacement therapy may be underrecognized and undertreated, leading to increased mortality.


2003 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lúcia Maria de Arruda Campos ◽  
Maria Helena B. Kiss ◽  
Élbio A. D'Amico ◽  
Clóvis Artur Almeida Silva

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequencies and behavior of antiphospholipid antibodies in 57 children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus. METHODS: Anticardiolipin antibodies were investigated by ELISA and lupus anticoagulant antibodies by the international tests recommended. The antiphospholipid antibodies analyses were performed in frozen samples (mean of 5.3 samples per patient obtained during a mean follow-up period of 3 years and 7 months) and on blood samples collected between January 1997 and November 1998 (mean of 2.5 samples per patient during a 2-year follow-up period). RESULTS: The frequencies of antiphospholipid antibodies (anticardiolipin and lupus anticoagulant) were similar in the samples collected prospectively and in the frozen samples (retrospective study): 63.2% and 75.4% respectively. Positivity for these antibodies fluctuated during the follow-up period and was not associated with any clinical or laboratory parameters of lupus erythematosus, including autoantibodies and also including disease activity and/or severity scores. CONCLUSIONS: The frequencies of antiphospholipid antibodies in children and adolescents with lupus erythematosus were similar to those observed in adults. The positivity fluctuated during the follow-up and was not correlated with clinical and/or laboratory disease parameters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document