Evaluation of methods for recording adverse drug reactions in clinical trials

1990 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 534-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Nilsson
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bostjan Seruga ◽  
Lynn Sterling ◽  
Lisa Wang ◽  
Ian F. Tannock

Purpose Oncologists prescribe anticancer drugs based on results of phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but some safety concerns appear only later in updated drug labels. Here, we analyze adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of targeted anticancer agents from updated drug labels and their reporting in corresponding pivotal RCTs. Methods We searched the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Web site for approved targeted anticancer drugs with updates of their labels related to safety in 2008 and 2009 and at least one RCT referenced in the updated drug label. For each drug, serious ADRs, including potentially fatal ADRs, were identified from the updated label. Published reports of RCTs referenced in the label were searched to determine whether they described these ADRs. Results We identified 12 eligible targeted anticancer agents with 36 corresponding RCTs referenced in updated drug labels. There were 76 serious ADRs reported in updated drug labels, and 50% (n = 38) were potentially fatal. Of these, 39% (n = 30) of all serious ADRs and 39% (n = 15) of potentially fatal ADRs were not described in any published report of RCTs, whereas 49% and 58%, respectively, were not described in initial drug labels. After a median 4.3 years between initial approval and update of drug labels, 42% (n = 5) of targeted cancer agents acquired one or more boxed warnings (the highest level of FDA alert). Conclusion Published reports of pivotal RCTs and initial drug labels contain limited information about serious ADRs of targeted anticancer agents. Rare but serious ADRs may be important causes of morbidity and mortality in general oncologic practice.


Author(s):  
Ms Sushmitha ◽  
Ms. Sowmya ◽  
Sushma Rao

<p>Polypharmacy, co-prescribing multiple medication, is implausibly common and infrequently ends up in drug interactions that may have adverse facet effects. Currently, to help doctors in prescribing treatments, clinical call systems fireplace alerts once drug mixtures area unit prescribed that have glorious reactions. Those alerts area unit supported drug interaction severity stored in databases like Lexi-Interact. However, Lexi-Interact severity, that is predicated on clinical trials and literature reviews, doesn't embrace all drug interactions tho' there are several prescribed drug mixtures that haven’t been lined by literature. This paper is enforced by coaching a model that has comparatively high accuracy and recall with glorious Lexi-Interact severity values, the goal would be to check it on drug interactions with glorious severity. Specifically, a drug combine would have a foreseen severity so a panel of clinical pharmacists, people acquainted with clinical outcomes of drug interactions, would rate the validity of that foreseen severity. We intend to realize such reactive medication and report them to the doctors.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document