Non-linear quasi-optical cell with polarized nuclear target (PNT) material

1993 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Vertiy ◽  
S. P. Gavrilov ◽  
S. I. Tarapov
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Target ◽  
Optical Cell ◽  
Polarized Nuclear Target ◽  
Non Linear

Proton (neutron) spin rotation in a polarized nuclear target: Method for investigating nuclear interactions

1996 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir G. Baryshevsky ◽  
Alexander G. Shekhtman
Keyword(s):  
Spin Rotation ◽  
Neutron Spin ◽  
Nuclear Target ◽  
Polarized Nuclear Target ◽  
Nuclear Interactions

NMR calibration of a polarized nuclear target, part of which is radiation-damaged

1974 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 397-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Wollan
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Target ◽  
Polarized Nuclear Target

scholarly journals Polarized nuclear target based on parahydrogen induced polarization

2012 ◽  
Vol 694 ◽  
pp. 246-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Budker ◽  
M.P. Ledbetter ◽  
S. Appelt ◽  
L.S. Bouchard ◽  
B. Wojtsekhowski
Keyword(s):  
Induced Polarization ◽  
Nuclear Target ◽  
Polarized Nuclear Target

B. The Non-Linear Calculations for Pulsating Stars

1967 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 105-176
Author(s):  
Robert F. Christy
Keyword(s):  
Major Part ◽  
Afternoon Session ◽  
Discussion Session ◽  
Pulsating Stars ◽  
Fourth Symposium ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Considerable Discussion ◽  
Informal Approach ◽  
Preceding Session

(Ed. note: The custom in these Symposia has been to have a summary-introductory presentation which lasts about 1 to 1.5 hours, during which discussion from the floor is minor and usually directed at technical clarification. The remainder of the session is then devoted to discussion of the whole subject, oriented around the summary-introduction. The preceding session, I-A, at Nice, followed this pattern. Christy suggested that we might experiment in his presentation with a much more informal approach, allowing considerable discussion of the points raised in the summary-introduction during its presentation, with perhaps the entire morning spent in this way, reserving the afternoon session for discussion only. At Varenna, in the Fourth Symposium, several of the summaryintroductory papers presented from the astronomical viewpoint had been so full of concepts unfamiliar to a number of the aerodynamicists-physicists present, that a major part of the following discussion session had been devoted to simply clarifying concepts and then repeating a considerable amount of what had been summarized. So, always looking for alternatives which help to increase the understanding between the different disciplines by introducing clarification of concept as expeditiously as possible, we tried Christy's suggestion. Thus you will find the pattern of the following different from that in session I-A. I am much indebted to Christy for extensive collaboration in editing the resulting combined presentation and discussion. As always, however, I have taken upon myself the responsibility for the final editing, and so all shortcomings are on my head.)

A decomposition method in non-linear programmm

Optimization ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-559
Author(s):  
L. Gerencsér
Keyword(s):  
Decomposition Method ◽  
Non Linear

The licensing and accreditation debate: Linear thinking in a non-linear world?

1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
George W. Howe ◽  
James H. Dalton ◽  
Maurice J. Elias
Keyword(s):  
Non Linear
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document